CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of McQFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & McQFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold McQFold
MCC 0.408 > 0.319
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.476 ± 0.076 > 0.467 ± 0.087
Sensitivity 0.368 > 0.248
Positive Predictive Value 0.453 > 0.412
Total TP 2068 > 1392
Total TN 14427815 < 14428996
Total FP 2672 > 2052
Total FP CONTRA 352 > 175
Total FP INCONS 2141 > 1813
Total FP COMP 179 > 64
Total FN 3551 < 4227
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and McQFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and McQFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and McQFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and McQFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and McQFold).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2068
Total TN 14427815
Total FP 2672
Total FP CONTRA 352
Total FP INCONS 2141
Total FP COMP 179
Total FN 3551
Total Scores
MCC 0.408
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.476 ± 0.076
Sensitivity 0.368
Positive Predictive Value 0.453
Nr of predictions 54

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KFC_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 622 8 0 8 0 20
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 6 0 5 1 9
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.87 1.00 34 6071 3 0 0 3 5
2M58_A - 0.33 0.29 0.38 5 1640 8 1 7 0 12
2RP0_A - 0.58 0.42 0.83 5 345 1 0 1 0 7
2WDL_A - 0.43 0.37 0.50 447 3937333 444 31 410 3 757
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WW9_D - 0.18 0.15 0.24 4 1936 13 0 13 0 22
2WW9_E - 0.47 0.29 0.80 4 556 1 0 1 0 10
2ZZM_B 0.21 0.19 0.25 6 3462 18 0 18 0 26
2ZZN_D 0.80 0.74 0.87 20 2462 3 0 3 0 7
3A2K_C 0.41 0.39 0.44 11 2901 14 2 12 0 17
3A3A_A 0.84 0.70 1.00 26 3629 0 0 0 0 11
3ADB_C - 0.78 0.74 0.82 28 4152 6 0 6 0 10
3AKZ_H 0.16 0.14 0.19 4 2680 17 2 15 0 24
3AM1_B - 0.72 0.66 0.79 23 3211 6 0 6 0 12
3G4S_9 0.48 0.35 0.67 20 7351 11 1 9 1 37
3GCA_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 519 9 0 9 0 17
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.62 0.58 0.68 19 4250 9 0 9 0 14
3IYQ_A 0.31 0.34 0.29 32 60616 82 23 55 4 62
3IZ4_A 0.48 0.45 0.51 59 70760 58 11 46 1 73
3IZF_C 0.66 0.57 0.76 31 6862 10 1 9 0 23
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1210 15 1 14 0 17
3J2C_O - 0.58 0.49 0.69 31 10251 15 1 13 1 32
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 7477 31 2 19 10 28
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2827 23 1 22 0 32
3JYX_3 0.54 0.56 0.54 15 6300 24 1 12 11 12
3JYX_5 - 0.29 0.30 0.29 268 5021928 735 179 490 66 625
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.31 10 12214 35 5 17 13 23
3KIY_A - 0.43 0.36 0.50 449 4053235 456 24 420 12 792
3KTW_C - 0.71 0.63 0.82 27 4527 7 2 4 1 16
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.84 0.74 0.96 45 9133 3 0 2 1 16
3NKB_B - 0.59 0.54 0.67 14 1995 7 0 7 0 12
3NPB_A 0.74 0.61 0.90 28 6990 5 0 3 2 18
3O58_2 0.66 0.66 0.66 25 7222 14 4 9 1 13
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 37 2 21 14 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3W3S_B 0.50 0.45 0.56 18 4721 15 1 13 1 22
3ZEX_B - 0.29 0.26 0.32 147 1071922 322 35 276 11 411
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2617 12 2 9 1 12
3ZEX_D 0.72 0.61 0.86 30 6986 5 0 5 0 19
3ZEX_H - 0.18 0.18 0.18 7 9006 33 6 26 1 31
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21892 55 2 51 2 77
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 43 5 26 12 28
4ATO_G - 0.32 0.30 0.38 3 520 6 1 4 1 7
4ENB_A 0.67 0.58 0.79 11 1261 3 1 2 0 8
4FNJ_A - 0.75 0.63 0.91 10 584 1 0 1 0 6
4JRC_A - 0.24 0.22 0.29 5 1523 12 0 12 0 18

^top



Performance of McQFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for McQFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1392
Total TN 14428996
Total FP 2052
Total FP CONTRA 175
Total FP INCONS 1813
Total FP COMP 64
Total FN 4227
Total Scores
MCC 0.319
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.467 ± 0.087
Sensitivity 0.248
Positive Predictive Value 0.412
Nr of predictions 54

^top



2. Individual counts for McQFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KFC_A - 0.49 0.25 1.00 5 625 0 0 0 0 15
2KX8_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 845 1 0 1 0 3
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
2LKR_A - 0.51 0.46 0.58 18 6074 13 2 11 0 21
2M58_A - 0.56 0.47 0.67 8 1641 4 1 3 0 9
2RP0_A - 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 7
2WDL_A - 0.31 0.26 0.37 308 3937383 531 27 503 1 896
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2WW9_F - 0.71 0.60 0.86 6 293 1 0 1 0 4
2WW9_D - 0.32 0.23 0.46 6 1940 7 2 5 0 20
2WW9_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 556 5 0 5 0 14
2ZZM_B 0.21 0.19 0.24 6 3461 19 2 17 0 26
2ZZN_D 0.84 0.78 0.91 21 2462 2 0 2 0 6
3A2K_C 0.86 0.75 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 7
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3ADB_C - 0.92 0.84 1.00 32 4154 1 0 0 1 6
3AKZ_H 0.68 0.61 0.77 17 2679 6 1 4 1 11
3AM1_B - 0.91 0.83 1.00 29 3211 1 0 0 1 6
3G4S_9 0.27 0.21 0.36 12 7348 21 1 20 0 45
3GCA_A - 0.54 0.29 1.00 5 523 0 0 0 0 12
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.20 0.18 0.24 6 4253 19 2 17 0 27
3IYQ_A 0.28 0.31 0.26 29 60614 87 19 64 4 65
3IZ4_A 0.42 0.36 0.49 47 70780 53 6 43 4 85
3IZF_C 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 6867 6 0 6 0 24
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1215 10 0 10 0 17
3J2C_O - 0.53 0.43 0.66 27 10255 15 1 13 1 36
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7479 36 3 21 12 33
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2830 20 0 20 0 32
3JYX_3 0.21 0.22 0.20 6 6298 24 9 15 0 21
3JYX_5 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5022865 0 0 0 0 893
3JYX_4 0.20 0.21 0.19 7 12210 33 8 21 4 26
3KIY_A - 0.31 0.26 0.38 317 4053291 529 22 498 9 924
3KTW_C - 0.36 0.30 0.45 13 4531 17 1 15 1 30
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.81 0.70 0.93 43 9134 4 1 2 1 18
3NKB_B - 0.36 0.31 0.44 8 1998 10 1 9 0 18
3NPB_A 0.81 0.67 0.97 31 6989 4 1 0 3 15
3O58_2 0.83 0.71 0.96 27 7232 2 0 1 1 11
3O58_3 0.26 0.26 0.26 9 12368 26 10 16 0 26
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3U4M_B - 0.73 0.57 0.95 21 3138 1 0 1 0 16
3W3S_B 0.44 0.38 0.54 15 4725 14 0 13 1 25
3ZEX_B - 0.11 0.09 0.13 53 1071960 373 32 335 6 505
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2619 9 2 7 0 12
3ZEX_D 0.69 0.53 0.90 26 6992 3 1 2 0 23
3ZEX_H - 0.21 0.21 0.22 8 9009 29 6 22 1 30
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21894 53 4 47 2 77
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11748 33 5 23 5 28
4ATO_G - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 523 5 0 5 0 10
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4FNJ_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 588 7 0 7 0 16
4JRC_A - 0.83 0.70 1.00 16 1524 0 0 0 0 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.