CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & Murlet(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold Murlet(seed)
MCC 0.543 > 0.435
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.584 ± 0.161 > 0.428 ± 0.104
Sensitivity 0.483 > 0.246
Positive Predictive Value 0.616 < 0.775
Total TP 196 > 100
Total TN 69307 < 69496
Total FP 175 > 33
Total FP CONTRA 16 > 5
Total FP INCONS 106 > 24
Total FP COMP 53 > 4
Total FN 210 < 306
P-value 1.62913390836e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and Murlet(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and Murlet(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and Murlet(seed)).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 196
Total TN 69307
Total FP 175
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 106
Total FP COMP 53
Total FN 210
Total Scores
MCC 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.584 ± 0.161
Sensitivity 0.483
Positive Predictive Value 0.616
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 6 0 5 1 9
3A3A_A 0.84 0.70 1.00 26 3629 0 0 0 0 11
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 7477 31 2 19 10 28
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.31 10 12214 35 5 17 13 23
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.74 0.61 0.90 28 6990 5 0 3 2 18
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 37 2 21 14 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3W3S_B 0.50 0.45 0.56 18 4721 15 1 13 1 22
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 43 5 26 12 28
4ENB_A 0.67 0.58 0.79 11 1261 3 1 2 0 8

^top



Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 100
Total TN 69496
Total FP 33
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 24
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 306
Total Scores
MCC 0.435
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.428 ± 0.104
Sensitivity 0.246
Positive Predictive Value 0.775
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.52 0.27 1.00 3 403 0 0 0 0 8
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 0 12 0 20
3A3A_A 0.57 0.32 1.00 12 3643 0 0 0 0 25
3IVN_B 0.53 0.39 0.75 12 2330 4 2 2 0 19
3J3E_8 0.25 0.06 1.00 2 7501 2 0 0 2 31
3JYX_4 0.23 0.09 0.60 3 12241 4 0 2 2 30
3LA5_A 0.58 0.41 0.82 14 2468 3 1 2 0 20
3NPB_A 0.49 0.28 0.87 13 7006 2 1 1 0 33
3O58_3 0.45 0.20 1.00 7 12396 0 0 0 0 28
3RKF_A 0.53 0.35 0.80 12 2196 3 1 2 0 22
3W3S_B 0.41 0.23 0.75 9 4741 3 0 3 0 31
4A1C_2 0.46 0.21 1.00 7 11774 0 0 0 0 26
4ENB_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1269 0 0 0 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.