CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & RNAfold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold RNAfold
MCC 0.408 > 0.407
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.476 ± 0.076 < 0.491 ± 0.073
Sensitivity 0.368 > 0.367
Positive Predictive Value 0.453 > 0.451
Total TP 2068 > 2061
Total TN 14427815 > 14427811
Total FP 2672 < 2685
Total FP CONTRA 352 > 347
Total FP INCONS 2141 < 2157
Total FP COMP 179 < 181
Total FN 3551 < 3558
P-value 0.109706356059

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and RNAfold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNAfold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNAfold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and RNAfold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNAfold).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2068
Total TN 14427815
Total FP 2672
Total FP CONTRA 352
Total FP INCONS 2141
Total FP COMP 179
Total FN 3551
Total Scores
MCC 0.408
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.476 ± 0.076
Sensitivity 0.368
Positive Predictive Value 0.453
Nr of predictions 54

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KFC_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 622 8 0 8 0 20
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 6 0 5 1 9
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.87 1.00 34 6071 3 0 0 3 5
2M58_A - 0.33 0.29 0.38 5 1640 8 1 7 0 12
2RP0_A - 0.58 0.42 0.83 5 345 1 0 1 0 7
2WDL_A - 0.43 0.37 0.50 447 3937333 444 31 410 3 757
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WW9_D - 0.18 0.15 0.24 4 1936 13 0 13 0 22
2WW9_E - 0.47 0.29 0.80 4 556 1 0 1 0 10
2ZZM_B 0.21 0.19 0.25 6 3462 18 0 18 0 26
2ZZN_D 0.80 0.74 0.87 20 2462 3 0 3 0 7
3A2K_C 0.41 0.39 0.44 11 2901 14 2 12 0 17
3A3A_A 0.84 0.70 1.00 26 3629 0 0 0 0 11
3ADB_C - 0.78 0.74 0.82 28 4152 6 0 6 0 10
3AKZ_H 0.16 0.14 0.19 4 2680 17 2 15 0 24
3AM1_B - 0.72 0.66 0.79 23 3211 6 0 6 0 12
3G4S_9 0.48 0.35 0.67 20 7351 11 1 9 1 37
3GCA_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 519 9 0 9 0 17
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.62 0.58 0.68 19 4250 9 0 9 0 14
3IYQ_A 0.31 0.34 0.29 32 60616 82 23 55 4 62
3IZ4_A 0.48 0.45 0.51 59 70760 58 11 46 1 73
3IZF_C 0.66 0.57 0.76 31 6862 10 1 9 0 23
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1210 15 1 14 0 17
3J2C_O - 0.58 0.49 0.69 31 10251 15 1 13 1 32
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 7477 31 2 19 10 28
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2827 23 1 22 0 32
3JYX_3 0.54 0.56 0.54 15 6300 24 1 12 11 12
3JYX_5 - 0.29 0.30 0.29 268 5021928 735 179 490 66 625
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.31 10 12214 35 5 17 13 23
3KIY_A - 0.43 0.36 0.50 449 4053235 456 24 420 12 792
3KTW_C - 0.71 0.63 0.82 27 4527 7 2 4 1 16
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.84 0.74 0.96 45 9133 3 0 2 1 16
3NKB_B - 0.59 0.54 0.67 14 1995 7 0 7 0 12
3NPB_A 0.74 0.61 0.90 28 6990 5 0 3 2 18
3O58_2 0.66 0.66 0.66 25 7222 14 4 9 1 13
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 37 2 21 14 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3W3S_B 0.50 0.45 0.56 18 4721 15 1 13 1 22
3ZEX_B - 0.29 0.26 0.32 147 1071922 322 35 276 11 411
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2617 12 2 9 1 12
3ZEX_D 0.72 0.61 0.86 30 6986 5 0 5 0 19
3ZEX_H - 0.18 0.18 0.18 7 9006 33 6 26 1 31
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21892 55 2 51 2 77
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 43 5 26 12 28
4ATO_G - 0.32 0.30 0.38 3 520 6 1 4 1 7
4ENB_A 0.67 0.58 0.79 11 1261 3 1 2 0 8
4FNJ_A - 0.75 0.63 0.91 10 584 1 0 1 0 6
4JRC_A - 0.24 0.22 0.29 5 1523 12 0 12 0 18

^top



Performance of RNAfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2061
Total TN 14427811
Total FP 2685
Total FP CONTRA 347
Total FP INCONS 2157
Total FP COMP 181
Total FN 3558
Total Scores
MCC 0.407
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.491 ± 0.073
Sensitivity 0.367
Positive Predictive Value 0.451
Nr of predictions 54

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KFC_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 623 7 0 7 0 20
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.87 1.00 34 6071 3 0 0 3 5
2M58_A - 0.34 0.29 0.42 5 1641 7 1 6 0 12
2RP0_A - 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 7
2WDL_A - 0.41 0.36 0.48 428 3937321 473 27 445 1 776
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WW9_D - 0.14 0.12 0.19 3 1937 13 0 13 0 23
2WW9_E - 0.53 0.29 1.00 4 557 0 0 0 0 10
2ZZM_B 0.21 0.19 0.25 6 3462 18 0 18 0 26
2ZZN_D 0.82 0.78 0.88 21 2461 3 0 3 0 6
3A2K_C 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 2902 13 2 11 0 17
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3ADB_C - 0.33 0.32 0.35 12 4152 22 0 22 0 26
3AKZ_H 0.43 0.39 0.48 11 2678 12 2 10 0 17
3AM1_B - 0.68 0.63 0.73 22 3210 8 1 7 0 13
3G4S_9 0.51 0.39 0.69 22 7349 10 1 9 0 35
3GCA_A - 0.54 0.29 1.00 5 523 0 0 0 0 12
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.63 0.58 0.70 19 4251 9 0 8 1 14
3IYQ_A 0.31 0.34 0.29 32 60616 80 24 54 2 62
3IZ4_A 0.51 0.47 0.55 62 70763 52 10 41 1 70
3IZF_C 0.59 0.52 0.67 28 6861 14 1 13 0 26
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1213 12 0 12 0 17
3J2C_O - 0.64 0.54 0.76 34 10251 12 0 11 1 29
3J3E_8 0.16 0.15 0.19 5 7476 31 2 20 9 28
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2828 22 1 21 0 32
3JYX_3 0.62 0.63 0.61 17 6300 22 1 10 11 10
3JYX_5 - 0.31 0.32 0.31 285 5021945 718 179 456 83 608
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.32 10 12215 33 5 16 12 23
3KIY_A - 0.41 0.35 0.48 431 4053222 484 22 453 9 810
3KTW_C - 0.73 0.63 0.84 27 4528 6 2 3 1 16
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.77 0.69 0.86 42 9131 8 0 7 1 19
3NKB_B - 0.59 0.54 0.67 14 1995 7 0 7 0 12
3NPB_A 0.83 0.72 0.97 33 6987 4 0 1 3 13
3O58_2 0.59 0.61 0.58 23 7220 19 4 13 2 15
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 34 2 21 11 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3W3S_B 0.55 0.50 0.61 20 4720 14 1 12 1 20
3ZEX_B - 0.30 0.27 0.33 151 1071922 318 35 272 11 407
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2617 11 2 9 0 12
3ZEX_D 0.77 0.65 0.91 32 6986 3 0 3 0 17
3ZEX_H - 0.18 0.18 0.18 7 9006 32 6 26 0 31
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21893 54 4 48 2 77
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11744 43 5 27 11 28
4ATO_G - 0.32 0.30 0.38 3 520 5 1 4 0 7
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4FNJ_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 10 585 0 0 0 0 6
4JRC_A - 0.29 0.26 0.35 6 1523 11 0 11 0 17

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.