CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold RNAwolf
MCC 0.348 > 0.218
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.398 ± 0.140 > 0.281 ± 0.140
Sensitivity 0.312 > 0.203
Positive Predictive Value 0.389 > 0.235
Total TP 354 > 230
Total TN 1166275 > 1166206
Total FP 599 < 787
Total FP CONTRA 58 < 101
Total FP INCONS 497 < 647
Total FP COMP 44 > 39
Total FN 781 < 905
P-value 3.30280588002e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNAwolf).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 354
Total TN 1166275
Total FP 599
Total FP CONTRA 58
Total FP INCONS 497
Total FP COMP 44
Total FN 781
Total Scores
MCC 0.348
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.398 ± 0.140
Sensitivity 0.312
Positive Predictive Value 0.389
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 6 0 5 1 9
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.87 1.00 34 6071 3 0 0 3 5
2M58_A - 0.33 0.29 0.38 5 1640 8 1 7 0 12
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1210 15 1 14 0 17
3J2C_O - 0.58 0.49 0.69 31 10251 15 1 13 1 32
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 7477 31 2 19 10 28
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3W3S_B 0.50 0.45 0.56 18 4721 15 1 13 1 22
3ZEX_B - 0.29 0.26 0.32 147 1071922 322 35 276 11 411
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21892 55 2 51 2 77
3ZEX_D 0.72 0.61 0.86 30 6986 5 0 5 0 19
3ZEX_H - 0.18 0.18 0.18 7 9006 33 6 26 1 31
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2617 12 2 9 1 12
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 43 5 26 12 28
4ATO_G - 0.32 0.30 0.38 3 520 6 1 4 1 7
4ENB_A 0.67 0.58 0.79 11 1261 3 1 2 0 8
4FNJ_A - 0.75 0.63 0.91 10 584 1 0 1 0 6
4JRC_A - 0.24 0.22 0.29 5 1523 12 0 12 0 18

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 230
Total TN 1166206
Total FP 787
Total FP CONTRA 101
Total FP INCONS 647
Total FP COMP 39
Total FN 905
Total Scores
MCC 0.218
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.281 ± 0.140
Sensitivity 0.203
Positive Predictive Value 0.235
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 10 1522 8 0 8 0 10
2LKR_A - 0.81 0.74 0.88 29 6072 8 0 4 4 10
2M58_A - 0.51 0.47 0.57 8 1639 6 3 3 0 9
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1214 11 0 11 0 17
3J2C_O - 0.40 0.37 0.44 23 10244 30 0 29 1 40
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7470 42 4 29 9 33
3RKF_A 0.72 0.62 0.84 21 2186 4 0 4 0 13
3U4M_B - 0.44 0.38 0.52 14 3133 13 0 13 0 23
3W3S_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 25 4719 10 0 9 1 15
3ZEX_B - 0.14 0.13 0.15 70 1071902 417 55 353 9 488
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21876 69 10 59 0 77
3ZEX_D 0.20 0.18 0.22 9 6980 32 3 29 0 40
3ZEX_H - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 9006 40 8 31 1 38
3ZEX_F - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2613 20 6 9 5 12
4A1C_2 0.08 0.09 0.08 3 11741 46 10 27 9 30
4ATO_G - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 520 8 1 7 0 10
4ENB_A 0.35 0.32 0.40 6 1260 9 1 8 0 13
4FNJ_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 8 0 8 0 16
4JRC_A - 0.58 0.52 0.67 12 1522 6 0 6 0 11

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.