CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & RSpredict(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold RSpredict(seed)
MCC 0.500 > 0.242
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.540 ± 0.108 > 0.197 ± 0.114
Sensitivity 0.463 > 0.112
Positive Predictive Value 0.544 > 0.526
Total TP 455 > 110
Total TN 246062 < 246689
Total FP 456 > 103
Total FP CONTRA 66 > 9
Total FP INCONS 315 > 90
Total FP COMP 75 > 4
Total FN 527 < 872
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and RSpredict(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RSpredict(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RSpredict(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and RSpredict(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RSpredict(seed)).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 455
Total TN 246062
Total FP 456
Total FP CONTRA 66
Total FP INCONS 315
Total FP COMP 75
Total FN 527
Total Scores
MCC 0.500
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.540 ± 0.108
Sensitivity 0.463
Positive Predictive Value 0.544
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 6 0 5 1 9
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2ZZM_B 0.21 0.19 0.25 6 3462 18 0 18 0 26
2ZZN_D 0.80 0.74 0.87 20 2462 3 0 3 0 7
3A2K_C 0.41 0.39 0.44 11 2901 14 2 12 0 17
3A3A_A 0.84 0.70 1.00 26 3629 0 0 0 0 11
3AKZ_H 0.16 0.14 0.19 4 2680 17 2 15 0 24
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IYQ_A 0.31 0.34 0.29 32 60616 82 23 55 4 62
3IZ4_A 0.48 0.45 0.51 59 70760 58 11 46 1 73
3IZF_C 0.66 0.57 0.76 31 6862 10 1 9 0 23
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 7477 31 2 19 10 28
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2827 23 1 22 0 32
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.31 10 12214 35 5 17 13 23
3JYX_3 0.54 0.56 0.54 15 6300 24 1 12 11 12
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.74 0.61 0.90 28 6990 5 0 3 2 18
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 37 2 21 14 23
3O58_2 0.66 0.66 0.66 25 7222 14 4 9 1 13
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3W3S_B 0.50 0.45 0.56 18 4721 15 1 13 1 22
3ZEX_D 0.72 0.61 0.86 30 6986 5 0 5 0 19
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 43 5 26 12 28
4ENB_A 0.67 0.58 0.79 11 1261 3 1 2 0 8

^top



Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 110
Total TN 246689
Total FP 103
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 90
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 872
Total Scores
MCC 0.242
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.197 ± 0.114
Sensitivity 0.112
Positive Predictive Value 0.526
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.85 0.73 1.00 8 398 0 0 0 0 3
2KX8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 860 1 0 1 0 18
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1527 13 0 13 0 20
2WRQ_Y 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2848 3 1 1 1 17
2ZZM_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3482 4 0 4 0 32
2ZZN_D 0.43 0.19 1.00 5 2480 0 0 0 0 22
3A2K_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2924 2 0 2 0 28
3A3A_A 0.48 0.30 0.79 11 3641 3 0 3 0 26
3AKZ_H 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2699 2 0 2 0 28
3IVN_B 0.69 0.52 0.94 16 2329 1 0 1 0 15
3IYQ_A 0.14 0.07 0.28 7 60701 19 5 13 1 87
3IZ4_A 0.21 0.08 0.59 10 70859 7 0 7 0 122
3IZF_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6898 5 0 5 0 54
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 0 0 0 0 33
3JYV_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2846 4 0 4 0 32
3JYX_4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12241 5 0 5 0 33
3JYX_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6323 5 1 4 0 27
3LA5_A 0.70 0.50 1.00 17 2468 0 0 0 0 17
3NPB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7017 4 0 4 0 46
3O58_3 0.23 0.09 0.60 3 12398 2 0 2 0 32
3O58_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7257 3 0 3 0 38
3RKF_A 0.71 0.53 0.95 18 2192 1 0 1 0 16
3W3S_B 0.41 0.30 0.57 12 4732 10 1 8 1 28
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7019 2 0 2 0 49
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11777 5 1 3 1 33
4ENB_A 0.30 0.16 0.60 3 1270 2 0 2 0 16

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.