CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CMfinder(20) & Contrafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CMfinder(20) Contrafold
MCC 0.521 > 0.497
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.514 ± 0.127 > 0.479 ± 0.145
Sensitivity 0.366 < 0.445
Positive Predictive Value 0.748 > 0.563
Total TP 163 < 198
Total TN 67962 > 67828
Total FP 61 < 186
Total FP CONTRA 4 < 10
Total FP INCONS 51 < 144
Total FP COMP 6 < 32
Total FN 282 > 247
P-value 1.40919803867e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CMfinder(20) and Contrafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and Contrafold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and Contrafold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CMfinder(20) and Contrafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and Contrafold).

^top





Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 163
Total TN 67962
Total FP 61
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 51
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 282
Total Scores
MCC 0.521
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.514 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.366
Positive Predictive Value 0.748
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2833 1 0 0 1 13
3J2L_3 0.45 0.32 0.63 17 7848 11 1 9 1 36
3J3D_C 0.76 0.61 0.94 17 2757 1 0 1 0 11
3J3E_8 0.10 0.06 0.17 2 7491 10 1 9 0 31
3J3E_7 0.62 0.46 0.83 25 7110 5 1 4 0 29
3J3F_8 0.45 0.33 0.60 12 12226 8 1 7 0 24
3J3F_7 0.66 0.52 0.84 26 7229 6 0 5 1 24
3J3V_B 0.38 0.21 0.71 12 7004 5 0 5 0 45
3ZEX_D 0.58 0.39 0.86 19 6999 3 0 3 0 30
3ZND_W 0.45 0.39 0.53 9 2986 11 0 8 3 14
4FRG_B 0.47 0.22 1.00 7 3479 0 0 0 0 25

^top



Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 198
Total TN 67828
Total FP 186
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 144
Total FP COMP 32
Total FN 247
Total Scores
MCC 0.497
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.479 ± 0.145
Sensitivity 0.445
Positive Predictive Value 0.563
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.44 0.40 0.50 12 2826 13 0 12 1 18
3J2L_3 0.56 0.49 0.65 26 7835 16 0 14 2 27
3J3D_C 0.67 0.61 0.74 17 2752 6 0 6 0 11
3J3E_8 0.07 0.06 0.10 2 7483 32 1 17 14 31
3J3E_7 0.45 0.37 0.56 20 7104 16 1 15 0 34
3J3F_8 0.31 0.33 0.29 12 12205 41 4 25 12 24
3J3F_7 0.68 0.62 0.76 31 7219 11 0 10 1 19
3J3V_B 0.48 0.39 0.61 22 6985 14 1 13 0 35
3ZEX_D 0.73 0.67 0.80 33 6980 8 1 7 0 16
3ZND_W 0.19 0.22 0.18 5 2975 25 1 22 2 18
4FRG_B 0.68 0.56 0.82 18 3464 4 1 3 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.