CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CMfinder(20) & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CMfinder(20) Fold
MCC 0.521 > 0.470
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.514 ± 0.127 > 0.434 ± 0.163
Sensitivity 0.366 < 0.416
Positive Predictive Value 0.748 > 0.538
Total TP 163 < 185
Total TN 67962 > 67836
Total FP 61 < 188
Total FP CONTRA 4 < 15
Total FP INCONS 51 < 144
Total FP COMP 6 < 29
Total FN 282 > 260
P-value 1.70887622364e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CMfinder(20) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and Fold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and Fold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CMfinder(20) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and Fold).

^top





Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 163
Total TN 67962
Total FP 61
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 51
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 282
Total Scores
MCC 0.521
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.514 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.366
Positive Predictive Value 0.748
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2833 1 0 0 1 13
3J2L_3 0.45 0.32 0.63 17 7848 11 1 9 1 36
3J3D_C 0.76 0.61 0.94 17 2757 1 0 1 0 11
3J3E_8 0.10 0.06 0.17 2 7491 10 1 9 0 31
3J3E_7 0.62 0.46 0.83 25 7110 5 1 4 0 29
3J3F_8 0.45 0.33 0.60 12 12226 8 1 7 0 24
3J3F_7 0.66 0.52 0.84 26 7229 6 0 5 1 24
3J3V_B 0.38 0.21 0.71 12 7004 5 0 5 0 45
3ZEX_D 0.58 0.39 0.86 19 6999 3 0 3 0 30
3ZND_W 0.45 0.39 0.53 9 2986 11 0 8 3 14
4FRG_B 0.47 0.22 1.00 7 3479 0 0 0 0 25

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 185
Total TN 67836
Total FP 188
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 144
Total FP COMP 29
Total FN 260
Total Scores
MCC 0.470
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.434 ± 0.163
Sensitivity 0.416
Positive Predictive Value 0.538
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2827 12 0 11 1 18
3J2L_3 0.62 0.53 0.74 28 7837 12 0 10 2 25
3J3D_C 0.47 0.43 0.52 12 2752 11 1 10 0 16
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7478 34 2 23 9 33
3J3E_7 0.46 0.37 0.57 20 7105 15 1 14 0 34
3J3F_8 0.28 0.28 0.29 10 12211 39 5 20 14 26
3J3F_7 0.79 0.68 0.92 34 7223 4 0 3 1 16
3J3V_B 0.51 0.42 0.63 24 6983 14 1 13 0 33
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.67 0.87 33 6983 5 1 4 0 16
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 23 1 20 2 18
4FRG_B 0.24 0.22 0.27 7 3460 19 3 16 0 25

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.