CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CMfinder(20) & Multilign(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CMfinder(20) Multilign(20)
MCC 0.539 > 0.502
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.527 ± 0.138 > 0.477 ± 0.188
Sensitivity 0.389 < 0.418
Positive Predictive Value 0.751 > 0.609
Total TP 151 < 162
Total TN 60958 > 60893
Total FP 56 < 121
Total FP CONTRA 4 < 11
Total FP INCONS 46 < 93
Total FP COMP 6 < 17
Total FN 237 > 226
P-value 1.5677163434e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CMfinder(20) and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and Multilign(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and Multilign(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CMfinder(20) and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and Multilign(20)).

^top





Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 151
Total TN 60958
Total FP 56
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 46
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 237
Total Scores
MCC 0.539
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.527 ± 0.138
Sensitivity 0.389
Positive Predictive Value 0.751
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2833 1 0 0 1 13
3J2L_3 0.45 0.32 0.63 17 7848 11 1 9 1 36
3J3D_C 0.76 0.61 0.94 17 2757 1 0 1 0 11
3J3E_8 0.10 0.06 0.17 2 7491 10 1 9 0 31
3J3E_7 0.62 0.46 0.83 25 7110 5 1 4 0 29
3J3F_8 0.45 0.33 0.60 12 12226 8 1 7 0 24
3J3F_7 0.66 0.52 0.84 26 7229 6 0 5 1 24
3ZEX_D 0.58 0.39 0.86 19 6999 3 0 3 0 30
3ZND_W 0.45 0.39 0.53 9 2986 11 0 8 3 14
4FRG_B 0.47 0.22 1.00 7 3479 0 0 0 0 25

^top



Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 162
Total TN 60893
Total FP 121
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 93
Total FP COMP 17
Total FN 226
Total Scores
MCC 0.502
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.477 ± 0.188
Sensitivity 0.418
Positive Predictive Value 0.609
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.61 0.53 0.70 16 2827 8 1 6 1 14
3J2L_3 0.65 0.53 0.80 28 7840 9 0 7 2 25
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7481 22 6 16 0 33
3J3E_7 0.58 0.48 0.70 26 7103 11 0 11 0 28
3J3F_8 0.41 0.36 0.46 13 12218 27 1 14 12 23
3J3F_7 0.43 0.30 0.63 15 7236 9 0 9 0 35
3ZEX_D 0.75 0.65 0.86 32 6984 5 1 4 0 17
3ZND_W 0.41 0.39 0.43 9 2982 14 2 10 2 14
4FRG_B 0.12 0.09 0.17 3 3468 15 0 15 0 29

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.