CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Sfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CMfinder(20) & Sfold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CMfinder(20) Sfold
MCC 0.521 > 0.502
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.514 ± 0.127 > 0.472 ± 0.142
Sensitivity 0.366 < 0.427
Positive Predictive Value 0.748 > 0.597
Total TP 163 < 190
Total TN 67962 > 67862
Total FP 61 < 154
Total FP CONTRA 4 < 9
Total FP INCONS 51 < 119
Total FP COMP 6 < 26
Total FN 282 > 255
P-value 1.23704939182e-05

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CMfinder(20) and Sfold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and Sfold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and Sfold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CMfinder(20) and Sfold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and Sfold).

^top





Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 163
Total TN 67962
Total FP 61
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 51
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 282
Total Scores
MCC 0.521
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.514 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.366
Positive Predictive Value 0.748
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2833 1 0 0 1 13
3J2L_3 0.45 0.32 0.63 17 7848 11 1 9 1 36
3J3D_C 0.76 0.61 0.94 17 2757 1 0 1 0 11
3J3E_8 0.10 0.06 0.17 2 7491 10 1 9 0 31
3J3E_7 0.62 0.46 0.83 25 7110 5 1 4 0 29
3J3F_8 0.45 0.33 0.60 12 12226 8 1 7 0 24
3J3F_7 0.66 0.52 0.84 26 7229 6 0 5 1 24
3J3V_B 0.38 0.21 0.71 12 7004 5 0 5 0 45
3ZEX_D 0.58 0.39 0.86 19 6999 3 0 3 0 30
3ZND_W 0.45 0.39 0.53 9 2986 11 0 8 3 14
4FRG_B 0.47 0.22 1.00 7 3479 0 0 0 0 25

^top



Performance of Sfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 190
Total TN 67862
Total FP 154
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 119
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 255
Total Scores
MCC 0.502
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.472 ± 0.142
Sensitivity 0.427
Positive Predictive Value 0.597
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.43 0.40 0.48 12 2825 14 0 13 1 18
3J2L_3 0.62 0.53 0.74 28 7837 12 0 10 2 25
3J3D_C 0.36 0.25 0.54 7 2762 6 0 6 0 21
3J3E_8 0.06 0.06 0.08 2 7477 32 2 22 8 31
3J3E_7 0.60 0.50 0.73 27 7103 10 1 9 0 27
3J3F_8 0.35 0.33 0.38 12 12214 34 3 17 14 24
3J3F_7 0.69 0.60 0.79 30 7222 8 1 7 0 20
3J3V_B 0.51 0.37 0.72 21 6992 8 0 8 0 36
3ZEX_D 0.74 0.63 0.86 31 6985 5 0 5 0 18
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 22 1 20 1 18
4FRG_B 0.62 0.47 0.83 15 3468 3 1 2 0 17

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.