CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CMfinder(20) & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CMfinder(20) UNAFold
MCC 0.521 > 0.467
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.514 ± 0.127 > 0.432 ± 0.146
Sensitivity 0.366 < 0.411
Positive Predictive Value 0.748 > 0.538
Total TP 163 < 183
Total TN 67962 > 67840
Total FP 61 < 185
Total FP CONTRA 4 < 10
Total FP INCONS 51 < 147
Total FP COMP 6 < 28
Total FN 282 > 262
P-value 1.49298650753e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CMfinder(20) and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and UNAFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and UNAFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CMfinder(20) and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 163
Total TN 67962
Total FP 61
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 51
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 282
Total Scores
MCC 0.521
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.514 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.366
Positive Predictive Value 0.748
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2833 1 0 0 1 13
3J2L_3 0.45 0.32 0.63 17 7848 11 1 9 1 36
3J3D_C 0.76 0.61 0.94 17 2757 1 0 1 0 11
3J3E_8 0.10 0.06 0.17 2 7491 10 1 9 0 31
3J3E_7 0.62 0.46 0.83 25 7110 5 1 4 0 29
3J3F_8 0.45 0.33 0.60 12 12226 8 1 7 0 24
3J3F_7 0.66 0.52 0.84 26 7229 6 0 5 1 24
3J3V_B 0.38 0.21 0.71 12 7004 5 0 5 0 45
3ZEX_D 0.58 0.39 0.86 19 6999 3 0 3 0 30
3ZND_W 0.45 0.39 0.53 9 2986 11 0 8 3 14
4FRG_B 0.47 0.22 1.00 7 3479 0 0 0 0 25

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 183
Total TN 67840
Total FP 185
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 147
Total FP COMP 28
Total FN 262
Total Scores
MCC 0.467
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.432 ± 0.146
Sensitivity 0.411
Positive Predictive Value 0.538
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.43 0.40 0.48 12 2825 14 0 13 1 18
3J2L_3 0.62 0.53 0.74 28 7837 12 0 10 2 25
3J3D_C 0.28 0.25 0.32 7 2753 15 1 14 0 21
3J3E_8 0.10 0.09 0.12 3 7477 32 2 21 9 30
3J3E_7 0.45 0.37 0.56 20 7104 16 1 15 0 34
3J3F_8 0.30 0.31 0.29 11 12208 41 4 23 14 25
3J3F_7 0.73 0.62 0.86 31 7224 6 0 5 1 19
3J3V_B 0.55 0.44 0.69 25 6985 11 1 10 0 32
3ZEX_D 0.77 0.65 0.91 32 6986 3 0 3 0 17
3ZND_W 0.21 0.22 0.21 5 2979 20 1 18 1 18
4FRG_B 0.32 0.28 0.38 9 3462 15 0 15 0 23

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.