CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CRWrnafold & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CRWrnafold PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.536 > 0.114
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.538 ± 0.219 > 0.061 ± 0.120
Sensitivity 0.472 > 0.024
Positive Predictive Value 0.616 > 0.538
Total TP 135 > 7
Total TN 36908 < 37114
Total FP 96 > 25
Total FP CONTRA 12 > 0
Total FP INCONS 72 > 6
Total FP COMP 12 < 19
Total FN 151 < 279
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CRWrnafold and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CRWrnafold and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 135
Total TN 36908
Total FP 96
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 72
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 151
Total Scores
MCC 0.536
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.538 ± 0.219
Sensitivity 0.472
Positive Predictive Value 0.616
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3J16_L 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2754 0 0 0 0 9
3SD1_A 0.52 0.45 0.61 19 3885 12 2 10 0 23
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 6 0 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.13 5 11741 44 4 31 9 28
4AOB_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 4344 8 2 5 1 22
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1313 2 1 1 0 8

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 7
Total TN 37114
Total FP 25
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 6
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 279
Total Scores
MCC 0.114
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.061 ± 0.120
Sensitivity 0.024
Positive Predictive Value 0.538
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.30 0.75 6 1532 2 0 2 0 14
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 27
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 30
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4A1C_2 0.08 0.03 0.20 1 11776 23 0 4 19 32
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.