CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CRWrnafold & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CRWrnafold RDfolder
MCC 0.513 > 0.230
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.437 ± 0.236 > 0.187 ± 0.133
Sensitivity 0.436 > 0.165
Positive Predictive Value 0.613 > 0.336
Total TP 103 > 39
Total TN 20856 < 20908
Total FP 68 < 80
Total FP CONTRA 10 > 7
Total FP INCONS 55 < 70
Total FP COMP 3 = 3
Total FN 133 < 197
P-value 7.60513176667e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CRWrnafold and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and RDfolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CRWrnafold and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 103
Total TN 20856
Total FP 68
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 55
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 133
Total Scores
MCC 0.513
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.437 ± 0.236
Sensitivity 0.436
Positive Predictive Value 0.613
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.31 0.50 5 1118 5 1 4 0 11
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J16_L 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2754 0 0 0 0 9
3SD1_A 0.52 0.45 0.61 19 3885 12 2 10 0 23
4AOB_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 4344 8 2 5 1 22
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1313 2 1 1 0 8

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 39
Total TN 20908
Total FP 80
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 70
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 197
Total Scores
MCC 0.230
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.187 ± 0.133
Sensitivity 0.165
Positive Predictive Value 0.336
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1526 14 2 12 0 20
3AMU_B 0.18 0.15 0.22 4 2985 16 2 12 2 23
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1220 5 0 5 0 17
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1124 4 1 3 0 16
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 462 3 1 2 0 4
3J16_L 0.22 0.17 0.31 5 2759 11 0 11 0 25
3SD1_A 0.30 0.17 0.54 7 3903 6 0 6 0 35
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1265 4 0 4 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 0 4 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.