CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CRWrnafold & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CRWrnafold TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.483 > 0.483
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.476 ± 0.272 > 0.473 ± 0.263
Sensitivity 0.428 > 0.397
Positive Predictive Value 0.554 < 0.595
Total TP 98 > 91
Total TN 31172 < 31196
Total FP 89 > 72
Total FP CONTRA 12 > 8
Total FP INCONS 67 > 54
Total FP COMP 10 = 10
Total FN 131 < 138
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CRWrnafold and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CRWrnafold and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 98
Total TN 31172
Total FP 89
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 67
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 131
Total Scores
MCC 0.483
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.476 ± 0.272
Sensitivity 0.428
Positive Predictive Value 0.554
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3SD1_A 0.52 0.45 0.61 19 3885 12 2 10 0 23
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 6 0 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.13 5 11741 44 4 31 9 28
4AOB_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 4344 8 2 5 1 22
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1313 2 1 1 0 8

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 91
Total TN 31196
Total FP 72
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 54
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 138
Total Scores
MCC 0.483
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.473 ± 0.263
Sensitivity 0.397
Positive Predictive Value 0.595
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11748 37 3 25 9 28
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.