CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Carnac(20) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Carnac(20) Afold
MCC 0.595 > 0.511
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.565 ± 0.119 > 0.534 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.382 < 0.460
Positive Predictive Value 0.928 > 0.572
Total TP 284 < 342
Total TN 173766 > 173474
Total FP 38 < 326
Total FP CONTRA 7 < 41
Total FP INCONS 15 < 215
Total FP COMP 16 < 70
Total FN 459 > 401
P-value 3.13260312532e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Carnac(20) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Carnac(20) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and Afold).

^top





Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 284
Total TN 173766
Total FP 38
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 15
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 459
Total Scores
MCC 0.595
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.565 ± 0.119
Sensitivity 0.382
Positive Predictive Value 0.928
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 400 0 0 0 0 5
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
3A2K_C 0.78 0.61 1.00 17 2909 0 0 0 0 11
3G4S_9 0.50 0.28 0.89 16 7363 2 1 1 0 41
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IZ4_A 0.47 0.23 0.94 31 70843 2 0 2 0 101
3IZF_C 0.73 0.56 0.97 30 6872 1 0 1 0 24
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 0 0 0 0 33
3JYV_7 0.68 0.50 0.94 16 2833 1 0 1 0 16
3JYX_3 0.64 0.56 0.75 15 6308 10 1 4 5 12
3JYX_4 0.46 0.21 1.00 7 12239 2 0 0 2 26
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.44 0.20 1.00 9 7012 2 0 0 2 37
3O58_2 0.83 0.71 0.96 27 7232 2 0 1 1 11
3O58_3 0.51 0.26 1.00 9 12394 0 0 0 0 26
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3ZEX_D 0.73 0.53 1.00 26 6995 0 0 0 0 23
4A1C_2 0.33 0.15 0.71 5 11774 3 0 2 1 28
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 342
Total TN 173474
Total FP 326
Total FP CONTRA 41
Total FP INCONS 215
Total FP COMP 70
Total FN 401
Total Scores
MCC 0.511
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.534 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.460
Positive Predictive Value 0.572
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
3A2K_C 0.41 0.39 0.44 11 2901 14 2 12 0 17
3G4S_9 0.48 0.35 0.67 20 7351 11 1 9 1 37
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IZ4_A 0.48 0.45 0.51 59 70760 58 11 46 1 73
3IZF_C 0.66 0.57 0.76 31 6862 10 1 9 0 23
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 7477 31 2 19 10 28
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2827 23 1 22 0 32
3JYX_3 0.54 0.56 0.54 15 6300 24 1 12 11 12
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.31 10 12214 35 5 17 13 23
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.74 0.61 0.90 28 6990 5 0 3 2 18
3O58_2 0.66 0.66 0.66 25 7222 14 4 9 1 13
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 37 2 21 14 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3ZEX_D 0.72 0.61 0.86 30 6986 5 0 5 0 19
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 43 5 26 12 28
4ENB_A 0.67 0.58 0.79 11 1261 3 1 2 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.