CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Carnac(20) & CMfinder(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Carnac(20) CMfinder(20)
MCC 0.574 > 0.521
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.538 ± 0.145 > 0.514 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.382 > 0.366
Positive Predictive Value 0.867 > 0.748
Total TP 170 > 163
Total TN 67984 > 67962
Total FP 31 < 61
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 4
Total FP INCONS 26 < 51
Total FP COMP 5 < 6
Total FN 275 < 282
P-value 5.40200680498e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Carnac(20) and CMfinder(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and CMfinder(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and CMfinder(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Carnac(20) and CMfinder(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and CMfinder(20)).

^top





Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 170
Total TN 67984
Total FP 31
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 26
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 275
Total Scores
MCC 0.574
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.538 ± 0.145
Sensitivity 0.382
Positive Predictive Value 0.867
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.62 0.53 0.73 16 2828 7 0 6 1 14
3J2L_3 0.46 0.34 0.64 18 7847 11 0 10 1 35
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 0 0 0 0 33
3J3E_7 0.65 0.44 0.96 24 7115 1 0 1 0 30
3J3F_8 0.50 0.25 1.00 9 12237 0 0 0 0 27
3J3F_7 0.66 0.44 1.00 22 7238 0 0 0 0 28
3J3V_B 0.58 0.35 0.95 20 7000 1 0 1 0 37
3ZEX_D 0.73 0.53 1.00 26 6995 0 0 0 0 23
3ZND_W 0.47 0.39 0.56 9 2987 10 0 7 3 14
4FRG_B 0.43 0.19 1.00 6 3480 0 0 0 0 26

^top



Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 163
Total TN 67962
Total FP 61
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 51
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 282
Total Scores
MCC 0.521
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.514 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.366
Positive Predictive Value 0.748
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2833 1 0 0 1 13
3J2L_3 0.45 0.32 0.63 17 7848 11 1 9 1 36
3J3D_C 0.76 0.61 0.94 17 2757 1 0 1 0 11
3J3E_8 0.10 0.06 0.17 2 7491 10 1 9 0 31
3J3E_7 0.62 0.46 0.83 25 7110 5 1 4 0 29
3J3F_8 0.45 0.33 0.60 12 12226 8 1 7 0 24
3J3F_7 0.66 0.52 0.84 26 7229 6 0 5 1 24
3J3V_B 0.38 0.21 0.71 12 7004 5 0 5 0 45
3ZEX_D 0.58 0.39 0.86 19 6999 3 0 3 0 30
3ZND_W 0.45 0.39 0.53 9 2986 11 0 8 3 14
4FRG_B 0.47 0.22 1.00 7 3479 0 0 0 0 25

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.