CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PknotsRG - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Carnac(20) & PknotsRG [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Carnac(20) PknotsRG
MCC 0.590 > 0.557
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.566 ± 0.072 < 0.573 ± 0.080
Sensitivity 0.389 < 0.494
Positive Predictive Value 0.899 > 0.633
Total TP 585 < 743
Total TN 284056 > 283534
Total FP 92 < 531
Total FP CONTRA 9 < 53
Total FP INCONS 57 < 377
Total FP COMP 26 < 101
Total FN 919 > 761
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Carnac(20) and PknotsRG. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and PknotsRG).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and PknotsRG).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Carnac(20) and PknotsRG. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and PknotsRG).

^top





Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 585
Total TN 284056
Total FP 92
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 57
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 919
Total Scores
MCC 0.590
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.566 ± 0.072
Sensitivity 0.389
Positive Predictive Value 0.899
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 400 0 0 0 0 5
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2XQD_Y 0.79 0.63 1.00 17 2833 0 0 0 0 10
3A2K_C 0.78 0.61 1.00 17 2909 0 0 0 0 11
3AMU_B 0.69 0.59 0.80 16 2983 6 0 4 2 11
3G4S_9 0.50 0.28 0.89 16 7363 2 1 1 0 41
3GX2_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 13 4358 0 0 0 0 27
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IZ4_A 0.47 0.23 0.94 31 70843 2 0 2 0 101
3IZF_C 0.73 0.56 0.97 30 6872 1 0 1 0 24
3J20_0 0.62 0.53 0.73 16 2828 7 0 6 1 14
3J20_1 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2909 0 0 0 0 6
3J2L_3 0.46 0.34 0.64 18 7847 11 0 10 1 35
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_7 0.65 0.44 0.96 24 7115 1 0 1 0 30
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 0 0 0 0 33
3J3F_7 0.66 0.44 1.00 22 7238 0 0 0 0 28
3J3F_8 0.50 0.25 1.00 9 12237 0 0 0 0 27
3J3V_B 0.58 0.35 0.95 20 7000 1 0 1 0 37
3JYV_7 0.68 0.50 0.94 16 2833 1 0 1 0 16
3JYX_4 0.46 0.21 1.00 7 12239 2 0 0 2 26
3JYX_3 0.64 0.56 0.75 15 6308 10 1 4 5 12
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.44 0.20 1.00 9 7012 2 0 0 2 37
3O58_2 0.83 0.71 0.96 27 7232 2 0 1 1 11
3O58_3 0.51 0.26 1.00 9 12394 0 0 0 0 26
3PDR_A 0.62 0.40 0.97 29 12850 3 0 1 2 43
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26
3ZEX_D 0.73 0.53 1.00 26 6995 0 0 0 0 23
3ZEX_C 0.31 0.13 0.70 7 14186 3 1 2 0 45
3ZND_W 0.47 0.39 0.56 9 2987 10 0 7 3 14
4A1C_2 0.33 0.15 0.71 5 11774 3 0 2 1 28
4A1C_3 0.67 0.52 0.88 28 7108 4 0 4 0 26
4AOB_A 0.49 0.33 0.74 14 4352 6 1 4 1 28
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19
4FRG_B 0.43 0.19 1.00 6 3480 0 0 0 0 26

^top



Performance of PknotsRG - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PknotsRG

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 743
Total TN 283534
Total FP 531
Total FP CONTRA 53
Total FP INCONS 377
Total FP COMP 101
Total FN 761
Total Scores
MCC 0.557
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.573 ± 0.080
Sensitivity 0.494
Positive Predictive Value 0.633
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for PknotsRG [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2WRQ_Y 0.53 0.53 0.53 9 2833 13 5 3 5 8
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
3A2K_C 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 2902 13 2 11 0 17
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3G4S_9 0.54 0.42 0.71 24 7347 10 1 9 0 33
3GX2_A 0.67 0.55 0.81 22 4344 6 0 5 1 18
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IZ4_A 0.51 0.47 0.55 62 70763 52 10 41 1 70
3IZF_C 0.59 0.52 0.67 28 6861 14 1 13 0 26
3J20_0 0.43 0.40 0.48 12 2825 14 0 13 1 18
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2L_3 0.62 0.53 0.74 28 7837 12 0 10 2 25
3J3D_C 0.60 0.54 0.68 15 2753 7 0 7 0 13
3J3E_7 0.58 0.48 0.70 26 7103 11 1 10 0 28
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 7477 30 2 19 9 28
3J3F_7 0.80 0.70 0.92 35 7222 4 0 3 1 15
3J3F_8 0.31 0.31 0.31 11 12211 37 4 20 13 25
3J3V_B 0.55 0.44 0.69 25 6985 11 1 10 0 32
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2828 22 1 21 0 32
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.32 10 12215 33 5 16 12 23
3JYX_3 0.62 0.63 0.61 17 6300 22 1 10 11 10
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.83 0.72 0.97 33 6987 3 0 1 2 13
3O58_2 0.59 0.61 0.58 23 7220 19 4 13 2 15
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 34 2 21 11 23
3PDR_A 0.75 0.63 0.90 45 12830 7 1 4 2 27
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.61 0.50 0.75 21 3888 7 1 6 0 21
3ZEX_D 0.77 0.65 0.91 32 6986 3 0 3 0 17
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.21 0.28 11 14157 43 1 27 15 41
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 22 1 20 1 18
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.13 5 11742 43 5 29 9 28
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 1 6 0 22
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.32 0.28 0.38 9 3462 15 0 15 0 23

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.