CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Carnac(20) & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Carnac(20) RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.520 > 0.478
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.498 ± 0.174 < 0.512 ± 0.184
Sensitivity 0.288 < 0.353
Positive Predictive Value 0.942 > 0.652
Total TP 98 < 120
Total TN 79150 > 79070
Total FP 9 < 96
Total FP CONTRA 1 < 8
Total FP INCONS 5 < 56
Total FP COMP 3 < 32
Total FN 242 > 220
P-value 1.45096400029e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Carnac(20) and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Carnac(20) and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 98
Total TN 79150
Total FP 9
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 5
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 242
Total Scores
MCC 0.520
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.498 ± 0.174
Sensitivity 0.288
Positive Predictive Value 0.942
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 400 0 0 0 0 5
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 0 0 0 0 33
3J3F_8 0.50 0.25 1.00 9 12237 0 0 0 0 27
3JYX_4 0.46 0.21 1.00 7 12239 2 0 0 2 26
3O58_3 0.51 0.26 1.00 9 12394 0 0 0 0 26
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26
3ZEX_C 0.31 0.13 0.70 7 14186 3 1 2 0 45
4A1C_2 0.33 0.15 0.71 5 11774 3 0 2 1 28

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 120
Total TN 79070
Total FP 96
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 56
Total FP COMP 32
Total FN 220
Total Scores
MCC 0.478
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.512 ± 0.184
Sensitivity 0.353
Positive Predictive Value 0.652
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3J3E_8 0.12 0.09 0.17 3 7485 22 2 13 7 30
3J3F_8 0.44 0.33 0.57 12 12225 15 1 8 6 24
3JYX_4 0.39 0.30 0.50 10 12226 13 2 8 3 23
3O58_3 0.45 0.34 0.60 12 12383 12 2 6 4 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.19 0.53 10 14177 13 1 8 4 42
4A1C_2 0.31 0.24 0.40 8 11761 20 0 12 8 25

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.