CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & CRWrnafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) CRWrnafold
MCC 0.687 > 0.546
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.661 ± 0.178 > 0.574 ± 0.189
Sensitivity 0.513 > 0.483
Positive Predictive Value 0.924 > 0.623
Total TP 121 > 114
Total TN 32681 > 32629
Total FP 15 < 81
Total FP CONTRA 1 < 10
Total FP INCONS 9 < 59
Total FP COMP 5 < 12
Total FN 115 < 122
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and CRWrnafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and CRWrnafold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and CRWrnafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and CRWrnafold).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 121
Total TN 32681
Total FP 15
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 9
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 115
Total Scores
MCC 0.687
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.661 ± 0.178
Sensitivity 0.513
Positive Predictive Value 0.924
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 1 0 0 1 7
3SD1_A 0.71 0.52 0.96 22 3893 1 0 1 0 20
4A1C_3 0.76 0.63 0.92 34 7103 4 0 3 1 20
4A1C_2 0.26 0.15 0.45 5 11770 8 1 5 2 28
4AOB_A 0.75 0.57 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 18
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 1319 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 114
Total TN 32629
Total FP 81
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 59
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 122
Total Scores
MCC 0.546
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.574 ± 0.189
Sensitivity 0.483
Positive Predictive Value 0.623
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3SD1_A 0.52 0.45 0.61 19 3885 12 2 10 0 23
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 6 0 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.13 5 11741 44 4 31 9 28
4AOB_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 4344 8 2 5 1 22
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1313 2 1 1 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.