CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) RNAwolf
MCC 0.669 > 0.348
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.645 ± 0.104 > 0.375 ± 0.099
Sensitivity 0.511 > 0.328
Positive Predictive Value 0.880 > 0.379
Total TP 404 > 259
Total TN 119866 > 119641
Total FP 67 < 467
Total FP CONTRA 4 < 53
Total FP INCONS 51 < 372
Total FP COMP 12 < 42
Total FN 386 < 531
P-value 5.23657817852e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 404
Total TN 119866
Total FP 67
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 51
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 386
Total Scores
MCC 0.669
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.645 ± 0.104
Sensitivity 0.511
Positive Predictive Value 0.880
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 1 0 0 1 7
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J2L_3 0.76 0.58 1.00 31 7844 2 0 0 2 22
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7499 4 0 4 0 33
3J3E_7 0.64 0.56 0.75 30 7100 10 0 10 0 24
3J3F_8 0.39 0.25 0.60 9 12231 6 1 5 0 27
3J3F_7 0.79 0.68 0.92 34 7223 4 0 3 1 16
3J3V_B 0.66 0.47 0.93 27 6992 2 0 2 0 30
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.71 0.52 0.96 22 3893 1 0 1 0 20
3ZEX_D 0.80 0.69 0.92 34 6984 3 0 3 0 15
3ZEX_C 0.38 0.21 0.69 11 14180 5 1 4 0 41
3ZND_W 0.47 0.43 0.53 10 2984 12 0 9 3 13
4A1C_3 0.76 0.63 0.92 34 7103 4 0 3 1 20
4A1C_2 0.26 0.15 0.45 5 11770 8 1 5 2 28
4AOB_A 0.75 0.57 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 18
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 1319 0 0 0 0 12
4FRG_B 0.69 0.53 0.89 17 3467 2 1 1 0 15

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 259
Total TN 119641
Total FP 467
Total FP CONTRA 53
Total FP INCONS 372
Total FP COMP 42
Total FN 531
Total Scores
MCC 0.348
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.375 ± 0.099
Sensitivity 0.328
Positive Predictive Value 0.379
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 17 2980 9 0 6 3 10
3J20_1 0.46 0.52 0.41 12 2897 17 6 11 0 11
3J20_0 0.40 0.40 0.41 12 2821 18 0 17 1 18
3J2L_3 0.55 0.49 0.62 26 7833 18 0 16 2 27
3J3D_C 0.79 0.75 0.84 21 2750 5 2 2 1 7
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7470 42 4 29 9 33
3J3E_7 0.41 0.35 0.49 19 7101 20 1 19 0 35
3J3F_8 0.23 0.25 0.21 9 12204 45 5 28 12 27
3J3F_7 0.21 0.20 0.23 10 7216 34 2 32 0 40
3J3V_B 0.43 0.37 0.51 21 6980 20 2 18 0 36
3RKF_A 0.72 0.62 0.84 21 2186 4 0 4 0 13
3SD1_A 0.46 0.43 0.50 18 3880 18 0 18 0 24
3ZEX_D 0.20 0.18 0.22 9 6980 32 3 29 0 40
3ZEX_C 0.05 0.06 0.06 3 14144 49 12 37 0 49
3ZND_W 0.50 0.48 0.52 11 2982 13 0 10 3 12
4A1C_3 0.23 0.20 0.28 11 7101 28 2 26 0 43
4A1C_2 0.08 0.09 0.08 3 11741 46 10 27 9 30
4AOB_A 0.23 0.19 0.30 8 4344 20 1 18 1 34
4ENB_A 0.35 0.32 0.40 6 1260 9 1 8 0 13
4ENC_A 0.34 0.32 0.38 6 1310 10 1 9 0 13
4FRG_B 0.56 0.50 0.64 16 3461 10 1 8 1 16

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.