CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) RDfolder
MCC 0.594 > 0.504
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.517 ± 0.102 > 0.509 ± 0.121
Sensitivity 0.369 < 0.407
Positive Predictive Value 0.963 > 0.635
Total TP 262 < 289
Total TN 67315 > 67132
Total FP 15 < 177
Total FP CONTRA 1 < 14
Total FP INCONS 9 < 152
Total FP COMP 5 < 11
Total FN 448 > 421
P-value 5.10776592382e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and RDfolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 262
Total TN 67315
Total FP 15
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 9
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 448
Total Scores
MCC 0.594
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.517 ± 0.102
Sensitivity 0.369
Positive Predictive Value 0.963
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 861 0 0 0 0 18
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1540 0 0 0 0 20
2WRQ_Y 0.24 0.12 0.50 2 2846 4 0 2 2 15
2WWQ_V 0.46 0.21 1.00 6 2920 0 0 0 0 22
2XQD_Y 0.47 0.22 1.00 6 2844 0 0 0 0 21
2ZZM_B 0.14 0.06 0.33 2 3480 4 0 4 0 30
2ZZN_D 0.47 0.22 1.00 6 2479 0 0 0 0 21
3A2K_C 0.46 0.21 1.00 6 2920 0 0 0 0 22
3A3A_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 27 3628 0 0 0 0 10
3AKZ_H 0.46 0.21 1.00 6 2695 0 0 0 0 22
3AMU_B 0.47 0.22 1.00 6 2997 0 0 0 0 21
3GX2_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 16
3IVN_B 0.78 0.65 0.95 20 2325 1 1 0 0 11
3J16_L 0.45 0.20 1.00 6 2769 0 0 0 0 24
3J20_0 0.45 0.20 1.00 6 2844 0 0 0 0 24
3J3D_C 0.46 0.21 1.00 6 2769 0 0 0 0 22
3JYV_7 0.43 0.19 1.00 6 2844 0 0 0 0 26
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.71 0.52 0.96 22 3893 1 0 1 0 20
3W3S_B 0.74 0.60 0.92 24 4727 3 0 2 1 16
4AOB_A 0.75 0.57 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 18
4ENB_A 0.65 0.42 1.00 8 1267 0 0 0 0 11
4ENC_A 0.65 0.42 1.00 8 1318 0 0 0 0 11

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 289
Total TN 67132
Total FP 177
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 152
Total FP COMP 11
Total FN 421
Total Scores
MCC 0.504
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.509 ± 0.121
Sensitivity 0.407
Positive Predictive Value 0.635
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.88 0.78 1.00 14 847 0 0 0 0 4
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1526 14 2 12 0 20
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 12 5 3 4 7
2WWQ_V 0.64 0.50 0.82 14 2909 4 0 3 1 14
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
2ZZM_B 0.10 0.09 0.13 3 3462 21 1 20 0 29
2ZZN_D 0.84 0.78 0.91 21 2462 2 0 2 0 6
3A2K_C 0.86 0.75 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 7
3A3A_A 0.53 0.41 0.71 15 3634 6 0 6 0 22
3AKZ_H 0.48 0.43 0.55 12 2679 11 1 9 1 16
3AMU_B 0.18 0.15 0.22 4 2985 16 2 12 2 23
3GX2_A 0.50 0.40 0.64 16 4346 10 1 8 1 24
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3J16_L 0.22 0.17 0.31 5 2759 11 0 11 0 25
3J20_0 0.73 0.57 0.94 17 2832 2 0 1 1 13
3J3D_C 0.72 0.61 0.85 17 2755 3 0 3 0 11
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2830 20 0 20 0 32
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.30 0.17 0.54 7 3903 6 0 6 0 35
3W3S_B 0.27 0.23 0.33 9 4726 18 1 17 0 31
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1265 4 0 4 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 0 4 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.