CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold Afold
MCC 0.462 > 0.402
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.507 ± 0.086 > 0.486 ± 0.078
Sensitivity 0.381 > 0.369
Positive Predictive Value 0.561 > 0.439
Total TP 1637 > 1586
Total TN 10481942 > 10481249
Total FP 1401 < 2199
Total FP CONTRA 251 < 320
Total FP INCONS 1029 < 1704
Total FP COMP 121 < 175
Total FN 2661 < 2712
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and Afold).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1637
Total TN 10481942
Total FP 1401
Total FP CONTRA 251
Total FP INCONS 1029
Total FP COMP 121
Total FN 2661
Total Scores
MCC 0.462
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.507 ± 0.086
Sensitivity 0.381
Positive Predictive Value 0.561
Nr of predictions 48

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LC8_A 0.49 0.35 0.70 7 1530 3 1 2 0 13
2LKR_A - 0.82 0.74 0.91 29 6073 4 0 3 1 10
2M58_A - 0.09 0.06 0.14 1 1646 6 0 6 0 16
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 12 5 3 4 7
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WW9_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 561 0 0 0 0 14
2WW9_D - 0.29 0.12 0.75 3 1949 1 0 1 0 23
2ZZM_B 0.18 0.16 0.23 5 3464 17 3 14 0 27
2ZZN_D 0.82 0.78 0.88 21 2461 3 0 3 0 6
3A2K_C 0.44 0.43 0.46 12 2900 14 2 12 0 16
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3ADB_C - 0.92 0.84 1.00 32 4154 0 0 0 0 6
3AKZ_H 0.43 0.39 0.48 11 2678 12 2 10 0 17
3AM1_B - 0.68 0.63 0.73 22 3210 8 1 7 0 13
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.80 0.67 0.96 22 4255 1 0 1 0 11
3IYQ_A 0.36 0.37 0.34 35 60624 71 17 50 4 59
3IZ4_A 0.55 0.45 0.68 59 70789 33 4 24 5 73
3IZF_C 0.68 0.61 0.77 33 6860 10 1 9 0 21
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1220 5 0 5 0 17
3J2C_O - 0.76 0.65 0.89 41 10250 6 0 5 1 22
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7485 21 2 16 3 33
3JYV_7 0.77 0.59 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 13
3JYX_5 - 0.36 0.33 0.40 294 5022122 510 149 300 61 599
3JYX_3 0.29 0.30 0.30 8 6301 20 8 11 1 19
3JYX_4 0.23 0.21 0.25 7 12218 25 5 16 4 26
3KIY_A - 0.53 0.41 0.69 505 4053393 246 24 206 16 736
3KTW_C - 0.45 0.40 0.53 17 4528 16 2 13 1 26
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.80 0.70 0.91 43 9133 5 0 4 1 18
3NKB_B - 0.57 0.50 0.65 13 1996 7 0 7 0 13
3NPB_A 0.77 0.70 0.86 32 6984 7 1 4 2 14
3O58_2 0.82 0.76 0.88 29 7227 7 1 3 3 9
3O58_3 0.38 0.29 0.50 10 12383 10 0 10 0 25
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3U4M_B - 0.57 0.46 0.71 17 3136 7 0 7 0 20
3W3S_B 0.87 0.78 0.97 31 4721 2 0 1 1 9
3ZEX_D 0.73 0.59 0.91 29 6989 3 0 3 0 20
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2619 9 2 7 0 12
3ZEX_H - 0.19 0.18 0.21 7 9011 27 4 23 0 31
3ZEX_B - 0.23 0.16 0.34 87 1072121 178 9 163 6 471
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21895 52 3 47 2 77
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11752 29 5 19 5 28
4ATO_G - 0.31 0.20 0.50 2 524 2 0 2 0 8
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4FNJ_A - 0.15 0.13 0.22 2 586 7 0 7 0 14
4JRC_A - 0.81 0.70 0.94 16 1523 1 0 1 0 7

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1586
Total TN 10481249
Total FP 2199
Total FP CONTRA 320
Total FP INCONS 1704
Total FP COMP 175
Total FN 2712
Total Scores
MCC 0.402
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.486 ± 0.078
Sensitivity 0.369
Positive Predictive Value 0.439
Nr of predictions 48

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 6 0 5 1 9
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.87 1.00 34 6071 3 0 0 3 5
2M58_A - 0.33 0.29 0.38 5 1640 8 1 7 0 12
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WW9_E - 0.47 0.29 0.80 4 556 1 0 1 0 10
2WW9_D - 0.18 0.15 0.24 4 1936 13 0 13 0 22
2ZZM_B 0.21 0.19 0.25 6 3462 18 0 18 0 26
2ZZN_D 0.80 0.74 0.87 20 2462 3 0 3 0 7
3A2K_C 0.41 0.39 0.44 11 2901 14 2 12 0 17
3A3A_A 0.84 0.70 1.00 26 3629 0 0 0 0 11
3ADB_C - 0.78 0.74 0.82 28 4152 6 0 6 0 10
3AKZ_H 0.16 0.14 0.19 4 2680 17 2 15 0 24
3AM1_B - 0.72 0.66 0.79 23 3211 6 0 6 0 12
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.62 0.58 0.68 19 4250 9 0 9 0 14
3IYQ_A 0.31 0.34 0.29 32 60616 82 23 55 4 62
3IZ4_A 0.48 0.45 0.51 59 70760 58 11 46 1 73
3IZF_C 0.66 0.57 0.76 31 6862 10 1 9 0 23
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1210 15 1 14 0 17
3J2C_O - 0.58 0.49 0.69 31 10251 15 1 13 1 32
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 7477 31 2 19 10 28
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2827 23 1 22 0 32
3JYX_5 - 0.29 0.30 0.29 268 5021928 735 179 490 66 625
3JYX_3 0.54 0.56 0.54 15 6300 24 1 12 11 12
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.31 10 12214 35 5 17 13 23
3KIY_A - 0.43 0.36 0.50 449 4053235 456 24 420 12 792
3KTW_C - 0.71 0.63 0.82 27 4527 7 2 4 1 16
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.84 0.74 0.96 45 9133 3 0 2 1 16
3NKB_B - 0.59 0.54 0.67 14 1995 7 0 7 0 12
3NPB_A 0.74 0.61 0.90 28 6990 5 0 3 2 18
3O58_2 0.66 0.66 0.66 25 7222 14 4 9 1 13
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 37 2 21 14 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3W3S_B 0.50 0.45 0.56 18 4721 15 1 13 1 22
3ZEX_D 0.72 0.61 0.86 30 6986 5 0 5 0 19
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2617 12 2 9 1 12
3ZEX_H - 0.18 0.18 0.18 7 9006 33 6 26 1 31
3ZEX_B - 0.29 0.26 0.32 147 1071922 322 35 276 11 411
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21892 55 2 51 2 77
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 43 5 26 12 28
4ATO_G - 0.32 0.30 0.38 3 520 6 1 4 1 7
4ENB_A 0.67 0.58 0.79 11 1261 3 1 2 0 8
4FNJ_A - 0.75 0.63 0.91 10 584 1 0 1 0 6
4JRC_A - 0.24 0.22 0.29 5 1523 12 0 12 0 18

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.