CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & CRWrnafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold CRWrnafold
MCC 0.522 > 0.467
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.472 ± 0.147 > 0.424 ± 0.161
Sensitivity 0.428 > 0.410
Positive Predictive Value 0.645 > 0.540
Total TP 185 > 177
Total TN 55139 > 55098
Total FP 114 < 167
Total FP CONTRA 12 < 18
Total FP INCONS 90 < 133
Total FP COMP 12 < 16
Total FN 247 < 255
P-value 2.76499031155e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and CRWrnafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and CRWrnafold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and CRWrnafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and CRWrnafold).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 185
Total TN 55139
Total FP 114
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 90
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 247
Total Scores
MCC 0.522
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.472 ± 0.147
Sensitivity 0.428
Positive Predictive Value 0.645
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.49 0.35 0.70 7 1530 3 1 2 0 13
2LKR_A - 0.82 0.74 0.91 29 6073 4 0 3 1 10
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 465 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.41 0.31 0.56 5 1119 4 2 2 0 11
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.28 8 6187 24 0 21 3 25
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1220 5 0 5 0 17
3J16_L 0.50 0.40 0.63 12 2756 7 0 7 0 18
3SD1_A 0.58 0.48 0.71 20 3888 8 1 7 0 22
3U4M_B - 0.57 0.46 0.71 17 3136 7 0 7 0 20
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11752 29 5 19 5 28
4A1C_3 0.67 0.56 0.81 30 7103 7 1 6 0 24
4AOB_A 0.45 0.33 0.61 14 4348 10 1 8 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8

^top



Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 177
Total TN 55098
Total FP 167
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 133
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 255
Total Scores
MCC 0.467
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.424 ± 0.161
Sensitivity 0.410
Positive Predictive Value 0.540
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LKR_A - 0.52 0.44 0.63 17 6078 12 2 8 2 22
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.31 0.50 5 1118 5 1 4 0 11
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.28 8 6187 23 2 19 2 25
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J16_L 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2754 0 0 0 0 9
3SD1_A 0.52 0.45 0.61 19 3885 12 2 10 0 23
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.13 5 11741 44 4 31 9 28
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 6 0 6 0 22
4AOB_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 4344 8 2 5 1 22
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1313 2 1 1 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.