CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold MCFold
MCC 0.534 > 0.385
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.501 ± 0.067 > 0.371 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.449 > 0.398
Positive Predictive Value 0.642 > 0.381
Total TP 895 > 793
Total TN 285732 > 285046
Total FP 552 < 1417
Total FP CONTRA 61 < 172
Total FP INCONS 438 < 1115
Total FP COMP 53 < 130
Total FN 1099 < 1201
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and MCFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and MCFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and MCFold).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 895
Total TN 285732
Total FP 552
Total FP CONTRA 61
Total FP INCONS 438
Total FP COMP 53
Total FN 1099
Total Scores
MCC 0.534
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.501 ± 0.067
Sensitivity 0.449
Positive Predictive Value 0.642
Nr of predictions 62

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.42 0.26 0.71 5 623 2 0 2 0 14
2LC8_A 0.49 0.35 0.70 7 1530 3 1 2 0 13
2LKR_A - 0.82 0.74 0.91 29 6073 4 0 3 1 10
2M58_A - 0.09 0.06 0.14 1 1646 6 0 6 0 16
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 12 5 3 4 7
2WW9_D - 0.29 0.12 0.75 3 1949 1 0 1 0 23
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WW9_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 561 0 0 0 0 14
2WWQ_V 0.80 0.68 0.95 19 2906 3 0 1 2 9
2XQD_Y 0.75 0.67 0.86 18 2829 3 0 3 0 9
2ZZN_D 0.82 0.78 0.88 21 2461 3 0 3 0 6
3A2K_C 0.44 0.43 0.46 12 2900 14 2 12 0 16
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3AKZ_H 0.43 0.39 0.48 11 2678 12 2 10 0 17
3AM1_B - 0.68 0.63 0.73 22 3210 8 1 7 0 13
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3GX2_A 0.79 0.63 1.00 25 4346 1 0 0 1 15
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.80 0.67 0.96 22 4255 1 0 1 0 11
3IZF_C 0.68 0.61 0.77 33 6860 10 1 9 0 21
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 465 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1220 5 0 5 0 17
3J0L_a - 0.41 0.31 0.56 5 1119 4 2 2 0 11
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.28 8 6187 24 0 21 3 25
3J16_L 0.50 0.40 0.63 12 2756 7 0 7 0 18
3J20_0 0.44 0.40 0.50 12 2826 13 0 12 1 18
3J2L_3 0.53 0.49 0.58 26 7830 21 0 19 2 27
3J3D_C 0.49 0.43 0.57 12 2754 9 0 9 0 16
3J3E_7 0.46 0.37 0.59 20 7106 14 1 13 0 34
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7485 21 2 16 3 33
3J3F_8 0.34 0.33 0.34 12 12211 34 4 19 11 24
3J3F_7 0.20 0.18 0.23 9 7221 30 1 29 0 41
3JYV_7 0.77 0.59 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 13
3JYX_3 0.29 0.30 0.30 8 6301 20 8 11 1 19
3JYX_4 0.23 0.21 0.25 7 12218 25 5 16 4 26
3KTW_C - 0.45 0.40 0.53 17 4528 16 2 13 1 26
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.80 0.70 0.91 43 9133 5 0 4 1 18
3NKB_B - 0.57 0.50 0.65 13 1996 7 0 7 0 13
3O58_3 0.38 0.29 0.50 10 12383 10 0 10 0 25
3O58_2 0.82 0.76 0.88 29 7227 7 1 3 3 9
3PDR_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 43 12832 7 0 5 2 29
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.58 0.48 0.71 20 3888 8 1 7 0 22
3U4M_B - 0.57 0.46 0.71 17 3136 7 0 7 0 20
3ZEX_D 0.73 0.59 0.91 29 6989 3 0 3 0 20
3ZEX_G - 0.36 0.28 0.46 21 16425 29 2 23 4 53
3ZEX_H - 0.19 0.18 0.21 7 9011 27 4 23 0 31
3ZEX_C 0.47 0.27 0.82 14 14179 3 1 2 0 38
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2619 9 2 7 0 12
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 23 1 20 2 18
4A1C_3 0.67 0.56 0.81 30 7103 7 1 6 0 24
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11752 29 5 19 5 28
4ATO_G - 0.31 0.20 0.50 2 524 2 0 2 0 8
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8
4FNJ_A - 0.15 0.13 0.22 2 586 7 0 7 0 14
4FRG_B 0.24 0.22 0.28 7 3461 18 3 15 0 25
4FRN_A 0.40 0.28 0.59 10 5134 7 2 5 0 26
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12
4JRC_A - 0.81 0.70 0.94 16 1523 1 0 1 0 7

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 793
Total TN 285046
Total FP 1417
Total FP CONTRA 172
Total FP INCONS 1115
Total FP COMP 130
Total FN 1201
Total Scores
MCC 0.385
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.371 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.398
Positive Predictive Value 0.381
Nr of predictions 62

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.91 0.89 0.94 16 844 2 0 1 1 2
2LA5_A - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 615 15 0 15 0 19
2LC8_A 0.41 0.45 0.39 9 1517 16 0 14 2 11
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.92 0.95 36 6067 14 0 2 12 3
2M58_A - 0.20 0.24 0.18 4 1631 19 2 16 1 13
2WRQ_Y 0.27 0.35 0.22 6 2823 25 8 13 4 11
2WW9_D - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1925 28 5 23 0 26
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WW9_E - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 547 14 0 14 0 14
2WWQ_V 0.15 0.18 0.15 5 2892 30 4 25 1 23
2XQD_Y 0.34 0.37 0.32 10 2819 22 1 20 1 17
2ZZN_D 0.61 0.63 0.61 17 2457 13 1 10 2 10
3A2K_C 0.44 0.46 0.42 13 2895 18 2 16 0 15
3A3A_A 0.89 0.86 0.91 32 3620 3 1 2 0 5
3AKZ_H 0.40 0.43 0.39 12 2670 19 3 16 0 16
3AM1_B - 0.93 0.89 0.97 31 3208 2 0 1 1 4
3AMU_B 0.44 0.48 0.42 13 2972 18 2 16 0 14
3GX2_A 0.47 0.48 0.48 19 4331 22 0 21 1 21
3IVN_B 0.39 0.39 0.40 12 2316 18 0 18 0 19
3IWN_A 0.19 0.21 0.18 7 4238 33 8 25 0 26
3IZF_C 0.71 0.69 0.74 37 6853 14 0 13 1 17
3J0L_g - 0.13 0.25 0.08 1 452 12 8 4 0 3
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1206 19 4 15 0 17
3J0L_a - 0.16 0.19 0.17 3 1110 15 1 14 0 13
3J0L_2 - 0.21 0.24 0.18 8 6172 39 7 29 3 25
3J16_L 0.45 0.47 0.44 14 2743 19 1 17 1 16
3J20_0 0.59 0.57 0.63 17 2823 12 1 9 2 13
3J2L_3 0.58 0.57 0.60 30 7825 23 2 18 3 23
3J3D_C 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 2747 18 2 14 2 16
3J3E_7 0.40 0.39 0.42 21 7090 29 3 26 0 33
3J3E_8 0.12 0.12 0.12 4 7470 46 3 26 17 29
3J3F_8 0.13 0.17 0.11 6 12191 61 9 40 12 30
3J3F_7 0.74 0.74 0.74 37 7210 17 2 11 4 13
3JYV_7 0.21 0.22 0.21 7 2817 26 0 26 0 25
3JYX_3 0.41 0.52 0.33 14 6285 34 12 17 5 13
3JYX_4 0.20 0.24 0.17 8 12199 43 16 23 4 25
3KTW_C - 0.40 0.40 0.43 17 4520 24 4 19 1 26
3LA5_A 0.32 0.32 0.34 11 2453 21 1 20 0 23
3NDB_M - 0.23 0.23 0.24 14 9121 46 1 44 1 47
3NKB_B - 0.56 0.58 0.56 15 1989 13 0 12 1 11
3O58_3 0.22 0.26 0.19 9 12355 45 9 30 6 26
3O58_2 0.20 0.24 0.17 9 7208 44 5 38 1 29
3PDR_A 0.66 0.61 0.72 44 12819 19 0 17 2 28
3RKF_A 0.70 0.65 0.76 22 2182 7 1 6 0 12
3SD1_A 0.33 0.33 0.35 14 3876 26 0 26 0 28
3U4M_B - 0.59 0.59 0.59 22 3123 15 0 15 0 15
3ZEX_D 0.17 0.18 0.18 9 6970 42 4 38 0 40
3ZEX_G - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 16456 15 1 14 0 74
3ZEX_H - 0.14 0.18 0.12 7 8987 52 14 37 1 31
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.21 0.28 11 14156 29 3 26 0 41
3ZEX_F - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2610 29 4 14 11 12
3ZND_W 0.19 0.22 0.18 5 2975 26 1 22 3 18
4A1C_3 0.68 0.67 0.71 36 7089 17 1 14 2 18
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.11 5 11735 56 10 31 15 28
4ATO_G - 0.30 0.30 0.33 3 519 8 0 6 2 7
4ENB_A 0.61 0.63 0.60 12 1255 8 2 6 0 7
4ENC_A 0.28 0.32 0.27 6 1304 17 2 14 1 13
4FNJ_A - 0.83 0.81 0.87 13 580 3 0 2 1 3
4FRG_B 0.32 0.34 0.31 11 3450 25 0 25 0 21
4FRN_A 0.12 0.14 0.12 5 5110 38 1 35 2 31
4JF2_A 0.66 0.68 0.66 21 2818 11 0 11 0 10
4JRC_A - 0.20 0.22 0.21 5 1516 19 0 19 0 18

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.