CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & Murlet(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold Murlet(seed)
MCC 0.565 > 0.447
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.561 ± 0.109 > 0.441 ± 0.067
Sensitivity 0.461 > 0.244
Positive Predictive Value 0.697 < 0.823
Total TP 385 > 204
Total TN 137646 < 137950
Total FP 197 > 51
Total FP CONTRA 29 > 6
Total FP INCONS 138 > 38
Total FP COMP 30 > 7
Total FN 450 < 631
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and Murlet(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and Murlet(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and Murlet(seed)).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 385
Total TN 137646
Total FP 197
Total FP CONTRA 29
Total FP INCONS 138
Total FP COMP 30
Total FN 450
Total Scores
MCC 0.565
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.561 ± 0.109
Sensitivity 0.461
Positive Predictive Value 0.697
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.49 0.35 0.70 7 1530 3 1 2 0 13
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3GX2_A 0.79 0.63 1.00 25 4346 1 0 0 1 15
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7485 21 2 16 3 33
3J3F_8 0.34 0.33 0.34 12 12211 34 4 19 11 24
3JYX_4 0.23 0.21 0.25 7 12218 25 5 16 4 26
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.77 0.70 0.86 32 6984 7 1 4 2 14
3O58_3 0.38 0.29 0.50 10 12383 10 0 10 0 25
3PDR_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 43 12832 7 0 5 2 29
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.58 0.48 0.71 20 3888 8 1 7 0 22
3W1K_J 0.56 0.50 0.63 19 4156 11 2 9 0 19
3W3S_B 0.87 0.78 0.97 31 4721 2 0 1 1 9
3ZEX_C 0.47 0.27 0.82 14 14179 3 1 2 0 38
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11752 29 5 19 5 28
4AOB_A 0.45 0.33 0.61 14 4348 10 1 8 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.24 0.22 0.28 7 3461 18 3 15 0 25
4FRN_A 0.40 0.28 0.59 10 5134 7 2 5 0 26
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 204
Total TN 137950
Total FP 51
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 38
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 631
Total Scores
MCC 0.447
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.441 ± 0.067
Sensitivity 0.244
Positive Predictive Value 0.823
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 0 12 0 20
3A3A_A 0.57 0.32 1.00 12 3643 0 0 0 0 25
3GX2_A 0.59 0.35 1.00 14 4357 1 0 0 1 26
3IVN_B 0.53 0.39 0.75 12 2330 4 2 2 0 19
3J3E_8 0.25 0.06 1.00 2 7501 2 0 0 2 31
3J3F_8 0.44 0.19 1.00 7 12239 0 0 0 0 29
3JYX_4 0.23 0.09 0.60 3 12241 4 0 2 2 30
3LA5_A 0.58 0.41 0.82 14 2468 3 1 2 0 20
3NPB_A 0.49 0.28 0.87 13 7006 2 1 1 0 33
3O58_3 0.45 0.20 1.00 7 12396 0 0 0 0 28
3PDR_A 0.44 0.19 1.00 14 12866 0 0 0 0 58
3RKF_A 0.53 0.35 0.80 12 2196 3 1 2 0 22
3SD1_A 0.47 0.26 0.85 11 3903 2 0 2 0 31
3W1K_J 0.43 0.21 0.89 8 4177 1 0 1 0 30
3W3S_B 0.41 0.23 0.75 9 4741 3 0 3 0 31
3ZEX_C 0.37 0.13 1.00 7 14189 0 0 0 0 45
4A1C_2 0.46 0.21 1.00 7 11774 0 0 0 0 26
4AOB_A 0.58 0.33 1.00 14 4357 1 0 0 1 28
4ENB_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1269 0 0 0 0 13
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13
4FRG_B 0.15 0.09 0.25 3 3474 9 0 9 0 29
4FRN_A 0.58 0.39 0.88 14 5135 2 1 1 0 22
4JF2_A 0.51 0.29 0.90 9 2840 2 0 1 1 22

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.