CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & ProbKnot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold ProbKnot
MCC 0.482 > 0.478
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.494 ± 0.067 < 0.500 ± 0.069
Sensitivity 0.393 < 0.423
Positive Predictive Value 0.594 > 0.542
Total TP 1423 < 1531
Total TN 2726087 > 2725661
Total FP 1049 < 1413
Total FP CONTRA 90 < 151
Total FP INCONS 884 < 1141
Total FP COMP 75 < 121
Total FN 2198 > 2090
P-value 4.13872543599e-05

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and ProbKnot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and ProbKnot).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and ProbKnot).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and ProbKnot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and ProbKnot).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1423
Total TN 2726087
Total FP 1049
Total FP CONTRA 90
Total FP INCONS 884
Total FP COMP 75
Total FN 2198
Total Scores
MCC 0.482
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.494 ± 0.067
Sensitivity 0.393
Positive Predictive Value 0.594
Nr of predictions 61

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.76 0.60 0.96 24 5126 5 0 1 4 16
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.42 0.26 0.71 5 623 2 0 2 0 14
2LC8_A 0.49 0.35 0.70 7 1530 3 1 2 0 13
2LKR_A - 0.82 0.74 0.91 29 6073 4 0 3 1 10
2M58_A - 0.09 0.06 0.14 1 1646 6 0 6 0 16
2XQD_Y 0.75 0.67 0.86 18 2829 3 0 3 0 9
3AKZ_H 0.43 0.39 0.48 11 2678 12 2 10 0 17
3AM1_B - 0.68 0.63 0.73 22 3210 8 1 7 0 13
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3IYQ_A 0.36 0.37 0.34 35 60624 71 17 50 4 59
3IZ4_A 0.55 0.45 0.68 59 70789 33 4 24 5 73
3IZF_C 0.68 0.61 0.77 33 6860 10 1 9 0 21
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1220 5 0 5 0 17
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.28 8 6187 24 0 21 3 25
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 465 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.41 0.31 0.56 5 1119 4 2 2 0 11
3J16_L 0.50 0.40 0.63 12 2756 7 0 7 0 18
3J20_2 0.56 0.48 0.67 303 1116310 158 8 144 6 330
3J20_1 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 2905 2 0 1 1 3
3J20_0 0.44 0.40 0.50 12 2826 13 0 12 1 18
3J2C_O - 0.76 0.65 0.89 41 10250 6 0 5 1 22
3J2C_M - 0.40 0.29 0.57 59 106387 47 5 40 2 148
3J2L_3 0.53 0.49 0.58 26 7830 21 0 19 2 27
3J3D_C 0.49 0.43 0.57 12 2754 9 0 9 0 16
3J3E_7 0.46 0.37 0.59 20 7106 14 1 13 0 34
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7485 21 2 16 3 33
3J3F_8 0.34 0.33 0.34 12 12211 34 4 19 11 24
3J3F_7 0.20 0.18 0.23 9 7221 30 1 29 0 41
3J3V_B 0.47 0.37 0.60 21 6986 14 1 13 0 36
3NDB_M - 0.80 0.70 0.91 43 9133 5 0 4 1 18
3NKB_B - 0.57 0.50 0.65 13 1996 7 0 7 0 13
3NPB_A 0.77 0.70 0.86 32 6984 7 1 4 2 14
3O58_3 0.38 0.29 0.50 10 12383 10 0 10 0 25
3O58_2 0.82 0.76 0.88 29 7227 7 1 3 3 9
3PDR_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 43 12832 7 0 5 2 29
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.58 0.48 0.71 20 3888 8 1 7 0 22
3U4M_B - 0.57 0.46 0.71 17 3136 7 0 7 0 20
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
3W1K_J 0.56 0.50 0.63 19 4156 11 2 9 0 19
3W3S_B 0.87 0.78 0.97 31 4721 2 0 1 1 9
3ZEX_B - 0.23 0.16 0.34 87 1072121 178 9 163 6 471
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2619 9 2 7 0 12
3ZEX_C 0.47 0.27 0.82 14 14179 3 1 2 0 38
3ZEX_H - 0.19 0.18 0.21 7 9011 27 4 23 0 31
3ZEX_D 0.73 0.59 0.91 29 6989 3 0 3 0 20
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21895 52 3 47 2 77
3ZEX_G - 0.36 0.28 0.46 21 16425 29 2 23 4 53
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 23 1 20 2 18
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11752 29 5 19 5 28
4A1C_3 0.67 0.56 0.81 30 7103 7 1 6 0 24
4AOB_A 0.45 0.33 0.61 14 4348 10 1 8 1 28
4ATO_G - 0.31 0.20 0.50 2 524 2 0 2 0 8
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8
4FNJ_A - 0.15 0.13 0.22 2 586 7 0 7 0 14
4FRG_B 0.24 0.22 0.28 7 3461 18 3 15 0 25
4FRN_A 0.40 0.28 0.59 10 5134 7 2 5 0 26
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12
4JRC_A - 0.81 0.70 0.94 16 1523 1 0 1 0 7

^top



Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1531
Total TN 2725661
Total FP 1413
Total FP CONTRA 151
Total FP INCONS 1141
Total FP COMP 121
Total FN 2090
Total Scores
MCC 0.478
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.500 ± 0.069
Sensitivity 0.423
Positive Predictive Value 0.542
Nr of predictions 61

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.69 0.60 0.80 24 5121 11 2 4 5 16
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.45 0.32 0.67 6 621 3 0 3 0 13
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LKR_A - 0.85 0.77 0.94 30 6073 4 0 2 2 9
2M58_A - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1638 15 0 15 0 17
2XQD_Y 0.90 0.81 1.00 22 2828 1 0 0 1 5
3AKZ_H 0.73 0.75 0.72 21 2672 8 4 4 0 7
3AM1_B - 0.74 0.71 0.78 25 3208 7 1 6 0 10
3AMU_B 0.65 0.59 0.73 16 2981 8 0 6 2 11
3IYQ_A 0.28 0.31 0.26 29 60616 85 22 59 4 65
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.46 0.60 61 70774 46 6 35 5 71
3IZF_C 0.72 0.61 0.85 33 6864 6 0 6 0 21
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_2 - 0.27 0.27 0.28 9 6184 26 2 21 3 24
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 458 7 2 5 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.55 0.50 0.62 8 1115 5 2 3 0 8
3J16_L 0.35 0.33 0.38 10 2749 16 1 15 0 20
3J20_2 0.50 0.43 0.57 272 1116290 208 11 192 5 361
3J20_1 0.71 0.70 0.73 16 2904 7 0 6 1 7
3J20_0 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2827 12 0 11 1 18
3J2C_O - 0.60 0.52 0.70 33 10249 15 0 14 1 30
3J2C_M - 0.37 0.30 0.45 63 106352 79 9 67 3 144
3J2L_3 0.60 0.49 0.74 26 7840 11 0 9 2 27
3J3D_C 0.46 0.43 0.50 12 2751 12 1 11 0 16
3J3E_7 0.47 0.35 0.63 19 7110 11 0 11 0 35
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7476 37 3 24 10 33
3J3F_8 0.35 0.33 0.36 12 12213 35 3 18 14 24
3J3F_7 0.76 0.64 0.91 32 7225 3 0 3 0 18
3J3V_B 0.53 0.42 0.67 24 6985 12 1 11 0 33
3NDB_M - 0.77 0.69 0.88 42 9132 7 0 6 1 19
3NKB_B - 0.59 0.54 0.67 14 1995 7 0 7 0 12
3NPB_A 0.72 0.61 0.85 28 6988 8 1 4 3 18
3O58_3 0.31 0.34 0.29 12 12362 41 4 25 12 23
3O58_2 0.76 0.76 0.76 29 7222 10 3 6 1 9
3PDR_A 0.74 0.64 0.85 46 12826 10 1 7 2 26
3RKF_A 0.73 0.59 0.91 20 2189 2 1 1 0 14
3SD1_A 0.55 0.48 0.65 20 3885 11 2 9 0 22
3U4M_B - 0.45 0.35 0.59 13 3138 9 1 8 0 24
3UZL_B 0.73 0.62 0.85 23 3543 4 0 4 0 14
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.89 0.80 1.00 32 4721 1 0 0 1 8
3ZEX_B - 0.29 0.26 0.33 146 1071940 307 34 260 13 412
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2620 11 2 6 3 12
3ZEX_C 0.38 0.31 0.47 16 14162 21 2 16 3 36
3ZEX_H - 0.19 0.18 0.19 7 9009 29 4 25 0 31
3ZEX_D 0.77 0.67 0.89 33 6984 4 0 4 0 16
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21886 61 2 57 2 77
3ZEX_G - 0.77 0.66 0.91 49 16417 10 0 5 5 25
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 24 1 20 3 18
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.12 5 11738 49 7 31 11 28
4A1C_3 0.73 0.61 0.87 33 7102 6 1 4 1 21
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ATO_G - 0.32 0.30 0.38 3 520 5 1 4 0 7
4ENB_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1263 1 1 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.45 0.42 0.50 8 1310 8 1 7 0 11
4FNJ_A - 0.66 0.50 0.89 8 586 1 0 1 0 8
4FRG_B 0.37 0.31 0.45 10 3464 12 3 9 0 22
4FRN_A 0.44 0.36 0.54 13 5127 11 2 9 0 23
4JF2_A 0.80 0.71 0.92 22 2826 2 2 0 0 9
4JRC_A - 0.25 0.22 0.31 5 1524 11 0 11 0 18

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.