CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold RDfolder
MCC 0.629 > 0.453
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.577 ± 0.084 > 0.433 ± 0.100
Sensitivity 0.521 > 0.354
Positive Predictive Value 0.768 > 0.589
Total TP 533 > 363
Total TN 93503 < 93581
Total FP 174 < 265
Total FP CONTRA 21 > 17
Total FP INCONS 140 < 236
Total FP COMP 13 > 12
Total FN 491 < 661
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RDfolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 533
Total TN 93503
Total FP 174
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 140
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 491
Total Scores
MCC 0.629
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.577 ± 0.084
Sensitivity 0.521
Positive Predictive Value 0.768
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.42 0.26 0.71 5 623 2 0 2 0 14
2LC8_A 0.49 0.35 0.70 7 1530 3 1 2 0 13
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 12 5 3 4 7
2WW9_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 561 0 0 0 0 14
2WW9_D - 0.29 0.12 0.75 3 1949 1 0 1 0 23
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WWQ_V 0.80 0.68 0.95 19 2906 3 0 1 2 9
2XQD_Y 0.75 0.67 0.86 18 2829 3 0 3 0 9
2ZZM_B 0.18 0.16 0.23 5 3464 17 3 14 0 27
2ZZN_D 0.82 0.78 0.88 21 2461 3 0 3 0 6
3A2K_C 0.44 0.43 0.46 12 2900 14 2 12 0 16
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3ADB_C - 0.92 0.84 1.00 32 4154 0 0 0 0 6
3AKZ_H 0.43 0.39 0.48 11 2678 12 2 10 0 17
3AM1_B - 0.68 0.63 0.73 22 3210 8 1 7 0 13
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3GX2_A 0.79 0.63 1.00 25 4346 1 0 0 1 15
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.80 0.67 0.96 22 4255 1 0 1 0 11
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1220 5 0 5 0 17
3J0L_a - 0.41 0.31 0.56 5 1119 4 2 2 0 11
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 465 0 0 0 0 4
3J16_L 0.50 0.40 0.63 12 2756 7 0 7 0 18
3J20_0 0.44 0.40 0.50 12 2826 13 0 12 1 18
3J3D_C 0.49 0.43 0.57 12 2754 9 0 9 0 16
3JYV_7 0.77 0.59 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 13
3KTW_C - 0.45 0.40 0.53 17 4528 16 2 13 1 26
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NKB_B - 0.57 0.50 0.65 13 1996 7 0 7 0 13
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.58 0.48 0.71 20 3888 8 1 7 0 22
3W3S_B 0.87 0.78 0.97 31 4721 2 0 1 1 9
4AOB_A 0.45 0.33 0.61 14 4348 10 1 8 1 28
4ATO_G - 0.31 0.20 0.50 2 524 2 0 2 0 8
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8
4JRC_A - 0.81 0.70 0.94 16 1523 1 0 1 0 7

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 363
Total TN 93581
Total FP 265
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 236
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 661
Total Scores
MCC 0.453
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.433 ± 0.100
Sensitivity 0.354
Positive Predictive Value 0.589
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.88 0.78 1.00 14 847 0 0 0 0 4
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1526 14 2 12 0 20
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 12 5 3 4 7
2WW9_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 556 5 0 5 0 14
2WW9_D - 0.29 0.12 0.75 3 1949 1 0 1 0 23
2WW9_F - 0.71 0.60 0.86 6 293 1 0 1 0 4
2WWQ_V 0.64 0.50 0.82 14 2909 4 0 3 1 14
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
2ZZM_B 0.10 0.09 0.13 3 3462 21 1 20 0 29
2ZZN_D 0.84 0.78 0.91 21 2462 2 0 2 0 6
3A2K_C 0.86 0.75 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 7
3A3A_A 0.53 0.41 0.71 15 3634 6 0 6 0 22
3ADB_C - 0.46 0.39 0.54 15 4158 13 0 13 0 23
3AKZ_H 0.48 0.43 0.55 12 2679 11 1 9 1 16
3AM1_B - 0.47 0.43 0.54 15 3212 13 1 12 0 20
3AMU_B 0.18 0.15 0.22 4 2985 16 2 12 2 23
3GX2_A 0.50 0.40 0.64 16 4346 10 1 8 1 24
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4268 10 0 10 0 33
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1220 5 0 5 0 17
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1124 4 1 3 0 16
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 462 3 1 2 0 4
3J16_L 0.22 0.17 0.31 5 2759 11 0 11 0 25
3J20_0 0.73 0.57 0.94 17 2832 2 0 1 1 13
3J3D_C 0.72 0.61 0.85 17 2755 3 0 3 0 11
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2830 20 0 20 0 32
3KTW_C - 0.08 0.07 0.12 3 4535 23 0 22 1 40
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NKB_B - 0.37 0.31 0.47 8 1999 9 0 9 0 18
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.30 0.17 0.54 7 3903 6 0 6 0 35
3W3S_B 0.27 0.23 0.33 9 4726 18 1 17 0 31
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ATO_G - 0.63 0.40 1.00 4 524 0 0 0 0 6
4ENB_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1265 4 0 4 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 0 4 0 13
4JRC_A - 0.81 0.65 1.00 15 1525 0 0 0 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.