CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold RNAwolf
MCC 0.446 > 0.317
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.445 ± 0.079 > 0.342 ± 0.075
Sensitivity 0.356 > 0.293
Positive Predictive Value 0.560 > 0.344
Total TP 1030 > 849
Total TN 2521948 > 2521319
Total FP 862 < 1693
Total FP CONTRA 63 < 186
Total FP INCONS 745 < 1432
Total FP COMP 54 < 75
Total FN 1866 < 2047
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1030
Total TN 2521948
Total FP 862
Total FP CONTRA 63
Total FP INCONS 745
Total FP COMP 54
Total FN 1866
Total Scores
MCC 0.446
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.445 ± 0.079
Sensitivity 0.356
Positive Predictive Value 0.560
Nr of predictions 46

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.49 0.35 0.70 7 1530 3 1 2 0 13
2LKR_A - 0.82 0.74 0.91 29 6073 4 0 3 1 10
2M58_A - 0.09 0.06 0.14 1 1646 6 0 6 0 16
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 465 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.41 0.31 0.56 5 1119 4 2 2 0 11
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.28 8 6187 24 0 21 3 25
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1220 5 0 5 0 17
3J16_L 0.50 0.40 0.63 12 2756 7 0 7 0 18
3J20_1 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 2905 2 0 1 1 3
3J20_2 0.56 0.48 0.67 303 1116310 158 8 144 6 330
3J20_0 0.44 0.40 0.50 12 2826 13 0 12 1 18
3J2C_O - 0.76 0.65 0.89 41 10250 6 0 5 1 22
3J2C_M - 0.40 0.29 0.57 59 106387 47 5 40 2 148
3J2L_3 0.53 0.49 0.58 26 7830 21 0 19 2 27
3J3D_C 0.49 0.43 0.57 12 2754 9 0 9 0 16
3J3E_7 0.46 0.37 0.59 20 7106 14 1 13 0 34
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7485 21 2 16 3 33
3J3F_8 0.34 0.33 0.34 12 12211 34 4 19 11 24
3J3F_7 0.20 0.18 0.23 9 7221 30 1 29 0 41
3J3V_B 0.47 0.37 0.60 21 6986 14 1 13 0 36
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.58 0.48 0.71 20 3888 8 1 7 0 22
3U4M_B - 0.57 0.46 0.71 17 3136 7 0 7 0 20
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
3W1K_J 0.56 0.50 0.63 19 4156 11 2 9 0 19
3W3S_B 0.87 0.78 0.97 31 4721 2 0 1 1 9
3ZEX_B - 0.23 0.16 0.34 87 1072121 178 9 163 6 471
3ZEX_D 0.73 0.59 0.91 29 6989 3 0 3 0 20
3ZEX_G - 0.36 0.28 0.46 21 16425 29 2 23 4 53
3ZEX_H - 0.19 0.18 0.21 7 9011 27 4 23 0 31
3ZEX_C 0.47 0.27 0.82 14 14179 3 1 2 0 38
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2619 9 2 7 0 12
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21895 52 3 47 2 77
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 23 1 20 2 18
4A1C_3 0.67 0.56 0.81 30 7103 7 1 6 0 24
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11752 29 5 19 5 28
4AOB_A 0.45 0.33 0.61 14 4348 10 1 8 1 28
4ATO_G - 0.31 0.20 0.50 2 524 2 0 2 0 8
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8
4FNJ_A - 0.15 0.13 0.22 2 586 7 0 7 0 14
4FRG_B 0.24 0.22 0.28 7 3461 18 3 15 0 25
4FRN_A 0.40 0.28 0.59 10 5134 7 2 5 0 26
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12
4JRC_A - 0.81 0.70 0.94 16 1523 1 0 1 0 7

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 849
Total TN 2521319
Total FP 1693
Total FP CONTRA 186
Total FP INCONS 1432
Total FP COMP 75
Total FN 2047
Total Scores
MCC 0.317
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.342 ± 0.075
Sensitivity 0.293
Positive Predictive Value 0.344
Nr of predictions 46

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 10 1522 8 0 8 0 10
2LKR_A - 0.81 0.74 0.88 29 6072 8 0 4 4 10
2M58_A - 0.51 0.47 0.57 8 1639 6 3 3 0 9
3AMU_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 17 2980 9 0 6 3 10
3J0L_g - 0.16 0.25 0.11 1 456 8 6 2 0 3
3J0L_a - 0.18 0.19 0.20 3 1113 12 1 11 0 13
3J0L_2 - 0.11 0.12 0.11 4 6181 34 5 26 3 29
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1214 11 0 11 0 17
3J16_L 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2752 11 0 11 0 18
3J20_1 0.46 0.52 0.41 12 2897 17 6 11 0 11
3J20_2 0.45 0.42 0.49 266 1116224 283 17 258 8 367
3J20_0 0.40 0.40 0.41 12 2821 18 0 17 1 18
3J2C_O - 0.40 0.37 0.44 23 10244 30 0 29 1 40
3J2C_M - 0.19 0.17 0.21 35 106323 133 11 122 0 172
3J2L_3 0.55 0.49 0.62 26 7833 18 0 16 2 27
3J3D_C 0.79 0.75 0.84 21 2750 5 2 2 1 7
3J3E_7 0.41 0.35 0.49 19 7101 20 1 19 0 35
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7470 42 4 29 9 33
3J3F_8 0.23 0.25 0.21 9 12204 45 5 28 12 27
3J3F_7 0.21 0.20 0.23 10 7216 34 2 32 0 40
3J3V_B 0.43 0.37 0.51 21 6980 20 2 18 0 36
3RKF_A 0.72 0.62 0.84 21 2186 4 0 4 0 13
3SD1_A 0.46 0.43 0.50 18 3880 18 0 18 0 24
3U4M_B - 0.44 0.38 0.52 14 3133 13 0 13 0 23
3UZL_B 0.72 0.59 0.88 22 3545 4 1 2 1 15
3W1K_J 0.71 0.66 0.78 25 4154 7 0 7 0 13
3W3S_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 25 4719 10 0 9 1 15
3ZEX_B - 0.14 0.13 0.15 70 1071902 417 55 353 9 488
3ZEX_D 0.20 0.18 0.22 9 6980 32 3 29 0 40
3ZEX_G - 0.20 0.18 0.23 13 16415 43 6 37 0 61
3ZEX_H - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 9006 40 8 31 1 38
3ZEX_C 0.05 0.06 0.06 3 14144 49 12 37 0 49
3ZEX_F - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2613 20 6 9 5 12
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21876 69 10 59 0 77
3ZND_W 0.50 0.48 0.52 11 2982 13 0 10 3 12
4A1C_3 0.23 0.20 0.28 11 7101 28 2 26 0 43
4A1C_2 0.08 0.09 0.08 3 11741 46 10 27 9 30
4AOB_A 0.23 0.19 0.30 8 4344 20 1 18 1 34
4ATO_G - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 520 8 1 7 0 10
4ENB_A 0.35 0.32 0.40 6 1260 9 1 8 0 13
4ENC_A 0.34 0.32 0.38 6 1310 10 1 9 0 13
4FNJ_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 8 0 8 0 16
4FRG_B 0.56 0.50 0.64 16 3461 10 1 8 1 16
4FRN_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 5119 32 0 32 0 36
4JF2_A 0.67 0.58 0.78 18 2827 5 3 2 0 13
4JRC_A - 0.58 0.52 0.67 12 1522 6 0 6 0 11

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.