CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & CMfinder(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST CMfinder(20)
MCC 0.538 > 0.521
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.507 ± 0.144 < 0.514 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.465 > 0.366
Positive Predictive Value 0.627 < 0.748
Total TP 207 > 163
Total TN 67850 < 67962
Total FP 142 > 61
Total FP CONTRA 13 > 4
Total FP INCONS 110 > 51
Total FP COMP 19 > 6
Total FN 238 < 282
P-value 2.35948134614e-05

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and CMfinder(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and CMfinder(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and CMfinder(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and CMfinder(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and CMfinder(20)).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 207
Total TN 67850
Total FP 142
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 110
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 238
Total Scores
MCC 0.538
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.507 ± 0.144
Sensitivity 0.465
Positive Predictive Value 0.627
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.35 0.37 0.34 11 2818 22 3 18 1 19
3J2L_3 0.73 0.62 0.87 33 7837 7 0 5 2 20
3J3D_C 0.68 0.61 0.77 17 2753 5 0 5 0 11
3J3E_8 0.05 0.03 0.08 1 7490 16 1 11 4 32
3J3E_7 0.64 0.54 0.76 29 7102 9 0 9 0 25
3J3F_8 0.33 0.33 0.33 12 12210 33 4 20 9 24
3J3F_7 0.65 0.58 0.74 29 7221 10 1 9 0 21
3J3V_B 0.51 0.37 0.72 21 6992 8 1 7 0 36
3ZEX_D 0.75 0.65 0.86 32 6984 5 0 5 0 17
3ZND_W 0.47 0.39 0.56 9 2987 10 0 7 3 14
4FRG_B 0.41 0.41 0.43 13 3456 17 3 14 0 19

^top



Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 163
Total TN 67962
Total FP 61
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 51
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 282
Total Scores
MCC 0.521
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.514 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.366
Positive Predictive Value 0.748
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2833 1 0 0 1 13
3J2L_3 0.45 0.32 0.63 17 7848 11 1 9 1 36
3J3D_C 0.76 0.61 0.94 17 2757 1 0 1 0 11
3J3E_8 0.10 0.06 0.17 2 7491 10 1 9 0 31
3J3E_7 0.62 0.46 0.83 25 7110 5 1 4 0 29
3J3F_8 0.45 0.33 0.60 12 12226 8 1 7 0 24
3J3F_7 0.66 0.52 0.84 26 7229 6 0 5 1 24
3J3V_B 0.38 0.21 0.71 12 7004 5 0 5 0 45
3ZEX_D 0.58 0.39 0.86 19 6999 3 0 3 0 30
3ZND_W 0.45 0.39 0.53 9 2986 11 0 8 3 14
4FRG_B 0.47 0.22 1.00 7 3479 0 0 0 0 25

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.