CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST RDfolder
MCC 0.624 > 0.400
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.551 ± 0.162 > 0.351 ± 0.154
Sensitivity 0.483 > 0.298
Positive Predictive Value 0.815 > 0.550
Total TP 198 > 122
Total TN 35540 < 35561
Total FP 50 < 104
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 8
Total FP INCONS 42 < 92
Total FP COMP 5 > 4
Total FN 212 < 288
P-value 3.05041766982e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RDfolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 198
Total TN 35540
Total FP 50
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 42
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 212
Total Scores
MCC 0.624
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.551 ± 0.162
Sensitivity 0.483
Positive Predictive Value 0.815
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1529 11 0 11 0 20
3AMU_B 0.82 0.70 0.95 19 2983 3 0 1 2 8
3J0L_7 - 0.60 0.41 0.88 7 1217 1 0 1 0 10
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 465 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1125 3 0 3 0 16
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_0 0.35 0.37 0.34 11 2818 22 3 18 1 19
3J3D_C 0.68 0.61 0.77 17 2753 5 0 5 0 11
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.64 0.45 0.90 19 3895 2 0 2 0 23
3W3S_B 0.85 0.73 1.00 29 4724 1 0 0 1 11
4AOB_A 0.71 0.50 1.00 21 4350 1 0 0 1 21
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8
4JRC_A - 0.75 0.57 1.00 13 1527 0 0 0 0 10

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 122
Total TN 35561
Total FP 104
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 92
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 288
Total Scores
MCC 0.400
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.351 ± 0.154
Sensitivity 0.298
Positive Predictive Value 0.550
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1526 14 2 12 0 20
3AMU_B 0.18 0.15 0.22 4 2985 16 2 12 2 23
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1220 5 0 5 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 462 3 1 2 0 4
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1124 4 1 3 0 16
3J16_L 0.22 0.17 0.31 5 2759 11 0 11 0 25
3J20_0 0.73 0.57 0.94 17 2832 2 0 1 1 13
3J3D_C 0.72 0.61 0.85 17 2755 3 0 3 0 11
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.30 0.17 0.54 7 3903 6 0 6 0 35
3W3S_B 0.27 0.23 0.33 9 4726 18 1 17 0 31
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1265 4 0 4 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 0 4 0 13
4JRC_A - 0.81 0.65 1.00 15 1525 0 0 0 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.