CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.472 > 0.434
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.440 ± 0.292 > 0.416 ± 0.217
Sensitivity 0.383 > 0.301
Positive Predictive Value 0.589 < 0.633
Total TP 103 > 81
Total TN 46625 < 46672
Total FP 92 > 69
Total FP CONTRA 10 > 3
Total FP INCONS 62 > 44
Total FP COMP 20 < 22
Total FN 166 < 188
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 103
Total TN 46625
Total FP 92
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 62
Total FP COMP 20
Total FN 166
Total Scores
MCC 0.472
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.440 ± 0.292
Sensitivity 0.383
Positive Predictive Value 0.589
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1529 11 0 11 0 20
3J3E_8 0.05 0.03 0.08 1 7490 16 1 11 4 32
3J3F_8 0.33 0.33 0.33 12 12210 33 4 20 9 24
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.64 0.45 0.90 19 3895 2 0 2 0 23
3W3S_B 0.85 0.73 1.00 29 4724 1 0 0 1 11
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.18 5 11753 29 5 18 6 28
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 81
Total TN 46672
Total FP 69
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 44
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 188
Total Scores
MCC 0.434
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.416 ± 0.217
Sensitivity 0.301
Positive Predictive Value 0.633
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 10 0 10 0 20
3J3E_8 0.12 0.09 0.17 3 7485 22 2 13 7 30
3J3F_8 0.44 0.33 0.57 12 12225 15 1 8 6 24
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26
3W3S_B 0.55 0.30 1.00 12 4741 1 0 0 1 28
4A1C_2 0.31 0.24 0.40 8 11761 20 0 12 8 25
4JF2_A 0.57 0.32 1.00 10 2840 0 0 0 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.