CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & RSpredict(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST RSpredict(20)
MCC 0.589 > 0.539
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.593 ± 0.113 > 0.516 ± 0.114
Sensitivity 0.501 > 0.414
Positive Predictive Value 0.699 < 0.709
Total TP 341 > 282
Total TN 98620 < 98710
Total FP 175 > 136
Total FP CONTRA 17 > 15
Total FP INCONS 130 > 101
Total FP COMP 28 > 20
Total FN 340 < 399
P-value 3.16042554876e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and RSpredict(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RSpredict(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RSpredict(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and RSpredict(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RSpredict(20)).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 341
Total TN 98620
Total FP 175
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 130
Total FP COMP 28
Total FN 340
Total Scores
MCC 0.589
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.593 ± 0.113
Sensitivity 0.501
Positive Predictive Value 0.699
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.82 0.70 0.95 19 2983 3 0 1 2 8
3J20_0 0.35 0.37 0.34 11 2818 22 3 18 1 19
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2L_3 0.73 0.62 0.87 33 7837 7 0 5 2 20
3J3D_C 0.68 0.61 0.77 17 2753 5 0 5 0 11
3J3E_7 0.64 0.54 0.76 29 7102 9 0 9 0 25
3J3E_8 0.05 0.03 0.08 1 7490 16 1 11 4 32
3J3F_7 0.65 0.58 0.74 29 7221 10 1 9 0 21
3J3F_8 0.33 0.33 0.33 12 12210 33 4 20 9 24
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.64 0.45 0.90 19 3895 2 0 2 0 23
3ZEX_D 0.75 0.65 0.86 32 6984 5 0 5 0 17
3ZND_W 0.47 0.39 0.56 9 2987 10 0 7 3 14
4A1C_3 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 7104 6 0 6 0 24
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.18 5 11753 29 5 18 6 28
4AOB_A 0.71 0.50 1.00 21 4350 1 0 0 1 21
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.41 0.41 0.43 13 3456 17 3 14 0 19

^top



Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 282
Total TN 98710
Total FP 136
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 101
Total FP COMP 20
Total FN 399
Total Scores
MCC 0.539
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.516 ± 0.114
Sensitivity 0.414
Positive Predictive Value 0.709
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.61 0.41 0.92 11 2991 1 0 1 0 16
3J20_0 0.80 0.67 0.95 20 2829 2 0 1 1 10
3J20_1 0.66 0.48 0.92 11 2914 1 0 1 0 12
3J2L_3 0.58 0.40 0.84 21 7850 5 0 4 1 32
3J3D_C 0.76 0.64 0.90 18 2755 2 0 2 0 10
3J3E_7 0.63 0.50 0.79 27 7106 7 1 6 0 27
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7484 19 4 15 0 33
3J3F_7 0.79 0.68 0.92 34 7223 3 0 3 0 16
3J3F_8 0.39 0.33 0.46 12 12220 23 2 12 9 24
3RKF_A 0.77 0.62 0.95 21 2189 1 0 1 0 13
3SD1_A 0.68 0.60 0.78 25 3884 7 1 6 0 17
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.65 0.89 32 6985 4 1 3 0 17
3ZND_W 0.34 0.22 0.56 5 2994 7 0 4 3 18
4A1C_3 0.48 0.33 0.69 18 7114 8 0 8 0 36
4A1C_2 0.19 0.18 0.20 6 11751 30 6 18 6 27
4AOB_A 0.28 0.14 0.55 6 4360 5 0 5 0 36
4ENB_A 0.48 0.32 0.75 6 1267 2 0 2 0 13
4ENC_A 0.45 0.32 0.67 6 1317 3 0 3 0 13
4FRG_B 0.17 0.09 0.33 3 3477 6 0 6 0 29

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.