CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & RSpredict(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST RSpredict(seed)
MCC 0.592 > 0.128
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.588 ± 0.105 > 0.090 ± 0.075
Sensitivity 0.503 > 0.051
Positive Predictive Value 0.703 > 0.328
Total TP 440 > 45
Total TN 119121 < 119610
Total FP 215 > 96
Total FP CONTRA 20 > 5
Total FP INCONS 166 > 87
Total FP COMP 29 > 4
Total FN 435 < 830
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and RSpredict(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RSpredict(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RSpredict(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and RSpredict(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RSpredict(seed)).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 440
Total TN 119121
Total FP 215
Total FP CONTRA 20
Total FP INCONS 166
Total FP COMP 29
Total FN 435
Total Scores
MCC 0.592
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.588 ± 0.105
Sensitivity 0.503
Positive Predictive Value 0.703
Nr of predictions 25

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1529 11 0 11 0 20
3AMU_B 0.82 0.70 0.95 19 2983 3 0 1 2 8
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_0 0.35 0.37 0.34 11 2818 22 3 18 1 19
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2L_3 0.73 0.62 0.87 33 7837 7 0 5 2 20
3J3D_C 0.68 0.61 0.77 17 2753 5 0 5 0 11
3J3E_7 0.64 0.54 0.76 29 7102 9 0 9 0 25
3J3E_8 0.05 0.03 0.08 1 7490 16 1 11 4 32
3J3F_8 0.33 0.33 0.33 12 12210 33 4 20 9 24
3J3F_7 0.65 0.58 0.74 29 7221 10 1 9 0 21
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.64 0.45 0.90 19 3895 2 0 2 0 23
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
3W3S_B 0.85 0.73 1.00 29 4724 1 0 0 1 11
3ZEX_D 0.75 0.65 0.86 32 6984 5 0 5 0 17
3ZND_W 0.47 0.39 0.56 9 2987 10 0 7 3 14
4A1C_3 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 7104 6 0 6 0 24
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.18 5 11753 29 5 18 6 28
4AOB_A 0.71 0.50 1.00 21 4350 1 0 0 1 21
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.41 0.41 0.43 13 3456 17 3 14 0 19
4FRN_A 0.36 0.39 0.34 14 5110 27 3 24 0 22
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 45
Total TN 119610
Total FP 96
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 87
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 830
Total Scores
MCC 0.128
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.090 ± 0.075
Sensitivity 0.051
Positive Predictive Value 0.328
Nr of predictions 25

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1527 13 0 13 0 20
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3001 2 0 2 0 27
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2774 1 0 1 0 30
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2846 4 0 4 0 30
3J20_1 0.09 0.04 0.20 1 2921 4 0 4 0 22
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7870 5 0 5 0 53
3J3D_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2771 4 1 3 0 28
3J3E_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7132 8 0 8 0 54
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 0 0 0 0 33
3J3F_8 0.14 0.06 0.33 2 12240 5 1 3 1 34
3J3F_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7256 4 0 4 0 50
3RKF_A 0.71 0.53 0.95 18 2192 1 0 1 0 16
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3564 6 0 6 0 37
3W3S_B 0.41 0.30 0.57 12 4732 10 1 8 1 28
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7019 2 0 2 0 49
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3000 4 0 3 1 23
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7136 4 1 3 0 54
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11777 5 1 3 1 33
4AOB_A 0.35 0.14 0.86 6 4364 1 0 1 0 36
4ENB_A 0.30 0.16 0.60 3 1270 2 0 2 0 16
4ENC_A 0.30 0.16 0.60 3 1321 2 0 2 0 16
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3484 2 0 2 0 32
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5148 3 0 3 0 36
4JF2_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2846 4 0 4 0 31

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.