CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & Vsfold5 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST Vsfold5
MCC 0.518 > 0.362
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.489 ± 0.102 > 0.373 ± 0.094
Sensitivity 0.399 > 0.309
Positive Predictive Value 0.677 > 0.433
Total TP 510 > 394
Total TN 180378 > 180222
Total FP 274 < 558
Total FP CONTRA 22 < 43
Total FP INCONS 221 < 472
Total FP COMP 31 < 43
Total FN 767 < 883
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and Vsfold5. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Vsfold5).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Vsfold5).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and Vsfold5. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and Vsfold5).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 510
Total TN 180378
Total FP 274
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 221
Total FP COMP 31
Total FN 767
Total Scores
MCC 0.518
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.489 ± 0.102
Sensitivity 0.399
Positive Predictive Value 0.677
Nr of predictions 37

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1529 11 0 11 0 20
2LKR_A - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6101 4 0 4 0 39
2M58_A - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1648 5 0 5 0 17
3AMU_B 0.82 0.70 0.95 19 2983 3 0 1 2 8
3J0L_7 - 0.60 0.41 0.88 7 1217 1 0 1 0 10
3J0L_2 - 0.49 0.24 1.00 8 6208 0 0 0 0 25
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 465 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1125 3 0 3 0 16
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.35 0.37 0.34 11 2818 22 3 18 1 19
3J2C_O - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 10296 0 0 0 0 63
3J2L_3 0.73 0.62 0.87 33 7837 7 0 5 2 20
3J3D_C 0.68 0.61 0.77 17 2753 5 0 5 0 11
3J3E_7 0.64 0.54 0.76 29 7102 9 0 9 0 25
3J3E_8 0.05 0.03 0.08 1 7490 16 1 11 4 32
3J3F_8 0.33 0.33 0.33 12 12210 33 4 20 9 24
3J3F_7 0.65 0.58 0.74 29 7221 10 1 9 0 21
3J3V_B 0.51 0.37 0.72 21 6992 8 1 7 0 36
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.64 0.45 0.90 19 3895 2 0 2 0 23
3U4M_B - 0.58 0.43 0.80 16 3140 4 0 4 0 21
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
3W3S_B 0.85 0.73 1.00 29 4724 1 0 0 1 11
3ZEX_D 0.75 0.65 0.86 32 6984 5 0 5 0 17
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21914 33 1 30 2 77
3ZND_W 0.47 0.39 0.56 9 2987 10 0 7 3 14
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.18 5 11753 29 5 18 6 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 7104 6 0 6 0 24
4AOB_A 0.71 0.50 1.00 21 4350 1 0 0 1 21
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.41 0.41 0.43 13 3456 17 3 14 0 19
4FRN_A 0.36 0.39 0.34 14 5110 27 3 24 0 22
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12
4JRC_A - 0.75 0.57 1.00 13 1527 0 0 0 0 10

^top



Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 394
Total TN 180222
Total FP 558
Total FP CONTRA 43
Total FP INCONS 472
Total FP COMP 43
Total FN 883
Total Scores
MCC 0.362
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.373 ± 0.094
Sensitivity 0.309
Positive Predictive Value 0.433
Nr of predictions 37

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LA5_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 623 7 0 7 0 19
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1527 13 0 13 0 20
2LKR_A - 0.27 0.23 0.32 9 6077 19 2 17 0 30
2M58_A - 0.32 0.24 0.44 4 1644 5 1 4 0 13
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_2 - 0.35 0.33 0.37 11 6186 21 3 16 2 22
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.31 0.50 5 1118 5 2 3 0 11
3J16_L 0.82 0.67 1.00 20 2755 0 0 0 0 10
3J20_1 0.71 0.70 0.73 16 2904 6 0 6 0 7
3J20_0 0.67 0.57 0.81 17 2829 5 1 3 1 13
3J2C_O - 0.30 0.24 0.39 15 10258 24 0 23 1 48
3J2L_3 0.56 0.45 0.71 24 7841 13 1 9 3 29
3J3D_C 0.60 0.54 0.68 15 2753 7 0 7 0 13
3J3E_7 0.47 0.37 0.61 20 7107 13 0 13 0 34
3J3E_8 0.06 0.06 0.08 2 7477 31 5 19 7 31
3J3F_8 0.33 0.33 0.33 12 12210 35 5 19 11 24
3J3F_7 0.21 0.18 0.26 9 7226 25 1 24 0 41
3J3V_B 0.16 0.12 0.21 7 6988 26 1 25 0 50
3RKF_A 0.75 0.65 0.88 22 2186 3 0 3 0 12
3SD1_A 0.11 0.10 0.15 4 3890 22 0 22 0 38
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.16 0.14 0.20 5 3545 20 1 19 0 32
3W3S_B 0.76 0.70 0.82 28 4719 7 1 5 1 12
3ZEX_D 0.08 0.06 0.11 3 6994 24 0 24 0 46
3ZEX_E - 0.07 0.06 0.08 5 21886 54 5 49 0 72
3ZND_W 0.41 0.39 0.43 9 2982 14 2 10 2 14
4A1C_2 0.24 0.24 0.24 8 11748 37 3 22 12 25
4A1C_3 0.26 0.22 0.32 12 7103 25 2 23 0 42
4AOB_A 0.18 0.14 0.25 6 4347 19 1 17 1 36
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.56 0.47 0.68 15 3464 7 1 6 0 17
4FRN_A 0.13 0.11 0.17 4 5128 19 2 17 0 32
4JF2_A 0.84 0.77 0.92 24 2824 2 1 1 0 7
4JRC_A - 0.25 0.22 0.31 5 1524 11 0 11 0 18

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.