CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & CRWrnafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold CRWrnafold
MCC 0.590 > 0.445
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.529 ± 0.170 > 0.398 ± 0.184
Sensitivity 0.477 > 0.391
Positive Predictive Value 0.736 > 0.514
Total TP 173 > 142
Total TN 48272 > 48231
Total FP 80 < 148
Total FP CONTRA 5 < 16
Total FP INCONS 57 < 118
Total FP COMP 18 > 14
Total FN 190 < 221
P-value 8.01312059156e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and CRWrnafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and CRWrnafold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and CRWrnafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and CRWrnafold).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 173
Total TN 48272
Total FP 80
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 57
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 190
Total Scores
MCC 0.590
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.529 ± 0.170
Sensitivity 0.477
Positive Predictive Value 0.736
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.55 0.50 0.63 10 1524 6 0 6 0 10
2LKR_A - 0.65 0.56 0.76 22 6076 9 0 7 2 17
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 462 3 1 2 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.71 0.56 0.90 9 1118 1 0 1 0 7
3J0L_2 - 0.64 0.61 0.69 20 6187 11 2 7 2 13
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3U4M_B - 0.75 0.57 1.00 21 3139 0 0 0 0 16
4A1C_2 0.20 0.15 0.28 5 11763 26 0 13 13 28
4A1C_3 0.78 0.63 0.97 34 7105 1 0 1 0 20
4AOB_A 0.52 0.40 0.68 17 4346 9 1 7 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top



Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 142
Total TN 48231
Total FP 148
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 118
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 221
Total Scores
MCC 0.445
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.398 ± 0.184
Sensitivity 0.391
Positive Predictive Value 0.514
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LKR_A - 0.52 0.44 0.63 17 6078 12 2 8 2 22
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.31 0.50 5 1118 5 1 4 0 11
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.28 8 6187 23 2 19 2 25
3J16_L 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2754 0 0 0 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.13 5 11741 44 4 31 9 28
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 6 0 6 0 22
4AOB_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 4344 8 2 5 1 22
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1313 2 1 1 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.