CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & Carnac(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold Carnac(20)
MCC 0.617 > 0.547
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.602 ± 0.134 > 0.477 ± 0.132
Sensitivity 0.499 > 0.351
Positive Predictive Value 0.767 < 0.858
Total TP 343 > 241
Total TN 110748 < 110914
Total FP 148 > 47
Total FP CONTRA 16 > 2
Total FP INCONS 88 > 38
Total FP COMP 44 > 7
Total FN 344 < 446
P-value 2.97012568641e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and Carnac(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Carnac(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Carnac(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and Carnac(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Carnac(20)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 343
Total TN 110748
Total FP 148
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 88
Total FP COMP 44
Total FN 344
Total Scores
MCC 0.617
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.602 ± 0.134
Sensitivity 0.499
Positive Predictive Value 0.767
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J2L_3 0.79 0.62 1.00 33 7842 2 0 0 2 20
3J3D_C 0.73 0.61 0.89 17 2756 2 0 2 0 11
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7483 29 9 11 9 33
3J3E_7 0.72 0.56 0.94 30 7108 2 0 2 0 24
3J3F_7 0.81 0.68 0.97 34 7225 1 0 1 0 16
3J3F_8 0.33 0.31 0.37 11 12216 29 3 16 10 25
3J3V_B 0.76 0.58 1.00 33 6988 0 0 0 0 24
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.67 0.97 33 6987 1 0 1 0 16
3ZEX_C 0.33 0.25 0.45 13 14167 22 1 15 6 39
3ZND_W 0.21 0.22 0.22 5 2980 20 0 18 2 18
4A1C_2 0.20 0.15 0.28 5 11763 26 0 13 13 28
4A1C_3 0.78 0.63 0.97 34 7105 1 0 1 0 20
4AOB_A 0.52 0.40 0.68 17 4346 9 1 7 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.71 0.56 0.90 18 3466 2 1 1 0 14

^top



Performance of Carnac(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 241
Total TN 110914
Total FP 47
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 38
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 446
Total Scores
MCC 0.547
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.477 ± 0.132
Sensitivity 0.351
Positive Predictive Value 0.858
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2909 0 0 0 0 6
3J20_0 0.62 0.53 0.73 16 2828 7 0 6 1 14
3J2L_3 0.46 0.34 0.64 18 7847 11 0 10 1 35
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 0 0 0 0 33
3J3E_7 0.65 0.44 0.96 24 7115 1 0 1 0 30
3J3F_7 0.66 0.44 1.00 22 7238 0 0 0 0 28
3J3F_8 0.50 0.25 1.00 9 12237 0 0 0 0 27
3J3V_B 0.58 0.35 0.95 20 7000 1 0 1 0 37
3ZEX_D 0.73 0.53 1.00 26 6995 0 0 0 0 23
3ZEX_C 0.31 0.13 0.70 7 14186 3 1 2 0 45
3ZND_W 0.47 0.39 0.56 9 2987 10 0 7 3 14
4A1C_2 0.33 0.15 0.71 5 11774 3 0 2 1 28
4A1C_3 0.67 0.52 0.88 28 7108 4 0 4 0 26
4AOB_A 0.49 0.33 0.74 14 4352 6 1 4 1 28
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19
4FRG_B 0.43 0.19 1.00 6 3480 0 0 0 0 26

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.