CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & CentroidAlifold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold CentroidAlifold(seed)
MCC 0.670 > 0.628
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.619 ± 0.096 > 0.527 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.552 > 0.443
Positive Predictive Value 0.815 < 0.891
Total TP 856 > 688
Total TN 1251735 < 1252013
Total FP 242 > 99
Total FP CONTRA 30 > 9
Total FP INCONS 164 > 75
Total FP COMP 48 > 15
Total FN 696 < 864
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and CentroidAlifold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and CentroidAlifold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and CentroidAlifold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and CentroidAlifold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and CentroidAlifold(seed)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 856
Total TN 1251735
Total FP 242
Total FP CONTRA 30
Total FP INCONS 164
Total FP COMP 48
Total FN 696
Total Scores
MCC 0.670
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.619 ± 0.096
Sensitivity 0.552
Positive Predictive Value 0.815
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.55 0.50 0.63 10 1524 6 0 6 0 10
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_2 0.73 0.61 0.87 387 1116318 63 8 52 3 246
3J2L_3 0.79 0.62 1.00 33 7842 2 0 0 2 20
3J3D_C 0.73 0.61 0.89 17 2756 2 0 2 0 11
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7483 29 9 11 9 33
3J3E_7 0.72 0.56 0.94 30 7108 2 0 2 0 24
3J3F_7 0.81 0.68 0.97 34 7225 1 0 1 0 16
3J3F_8 0.33 0.31 0.37 11 12216 29 3 16 10 25
3J3V_B 0.76 0.58 1.00 33 6988 0 0 0 0 24
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
3W1K_J 0.81 0.71 0.93 27 4157 2 1 1 0 11
3W3S_B 0.79 0.70 0.90 28 4722 4 0 3 1 12
3ZEX_C 0.33 0.25 0.45 13 14167 22 1 15 6 39
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.67 0.97 33 6987 1 0 1 0 16
3ZND_W 0.21 0.22 0.22 5 2980 20 0 18 2 18
4A1C_3 0.78 0.63 0.97 34 7105 1 0 1 0 20
4A1C_2 0.20 0.15 0.28 5 11763 26 0 13 13 28
4AOB_A 0.52 0.40 0.68 17 4346 9 1 7 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.71 0.56 0.90 18 3466 2 1 1 0 14
4FRN_A 0.40 0.33 0.50 12 5127 12 3 9 0 24
4JF2_A 0.50 0.39 0.67 12 2832 6 2 4 0 19

^top



Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 688
Total TN 1252013
Total FP 99
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 75
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 864
Total Scores
MCC 0.628
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.527 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.443
Positive Predictive Value 0.891
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1540 0 0 0 0 20
3J16_L 0.45 0.20 1.00 6 2769 0 0 0 0 24
3J20_0 0.45 0.20 1.00 6 2844 0 0 0 0 24
3J20_1 0.51 0.26 1.00 6 2920 0 0 0 0 17
3J20_2 0.72 0.60 0.86 381 1116321 70 5 58 7 252
3J2L_3 0.53 0.28 1.00 15 7860 2 0 0 2 38
3J3D_C 0.46 0.21 1.00 6 2769 0 0 0 0 22
3J3E_8 0.26 0.09 0.75 3 7499 1 0 1 0 30
3J3E_7 0.56 0.33 0.95 18 7121 1 0 1 0 36
3J3F_7 0.58 0.34 1.00 17 7243 1 0 0 1 33
3J3F_8 0.55 0.33 0.92 12 12233 1 0 1 0 24
3J3V_B 0.48 0.28 0.84 16 7002 3 0 3 0 41
3UZL_B 0.40 0.16 1.00 6 3564 0 0 0 0 31
3W1K_J 0.78 0.66 0.93 25 4159 2 1 1 0 13
3W3S_B 0.74 0.60 0.92 24 4727 3 0 2 1 16
3ZEX_C 0.46 0.23 0.92 12 14183 1 1 0 0 40
3ZEX_D 0.60 0.37 1.00 18 7003 0 0 0 0 31
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2998 6 0 5 1 23
4A1C_3 0.54 0.30 1.00 16 7124 0 0 0 0 38
4A1C_2 0.46 0.24 0.89 8 11772 3 0 1 2 25
4AOB_A 0.75 0.57 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 18
4ENB_A 0.65 0.42 1.00 8 1267 0 0 0 0 11
4ENC_A 0.65 0.42 1.00 8 1318 0 0 0 0 11
4FRG_B 0.69 0.53 0.89 17 3467 2 1 1 0 15
4FRN_A 0.71 0.56 0.91 20 5129 2 1 1 0 16
4JF2_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 16 2834 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.