CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & Multilign(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold Multilign(20)
MCC 0.628 > 0.514
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.609 ± 0.147 > 0.503 ± 0.141
Sensitivity 0.514 > 0.433
Positive Predictive Value 0.771 > 0.617
Total TP 297 > 250
Total TN 89593 > 89573
Total FP 126 < 177
Total FP CONTRA 15 < 17
Total FP INCONS 73 < 138
Total FP COMP 38 > 22
Total FN 281 < 328
P-value 2.7402423548e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Multilign(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Multilign(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Multilign(20)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 297
Total TN 89593
Total FP 126
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 73
Total FP COMP 38
Total FN 281
Total Scores
MCC 0.628
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.609 ± 0.147
Sensitivity 0.514
Positive Predictive Value 0.771
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J2L_3 0.79 0.62 1.00 33 7842 2 0 0 2 20
3J3D_C 0.73 0.61 0.89 17 2756 2 0 2 0 11
3J3E_7 0.72 0.56 0.94 30 7108 2 0 2 0 24
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7483 29 9 11 9 33
3J3F_8 0.33 0.31 0.37 11 12216 29 3 16 10 25
3J3F_7 0.81 0.68 0.97 34 7225 1 0 1 0 16
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.67 0.97 33 6987 1 0 1 0 16
3ZND_W 0.21 0.22 0.22 5 2980 20 0 18 2 18
4A1C_2 0.20 0.15 0.28 5 11763 26 0 13 13 28
4A1C_3 0.78 0.63 0.97 34 7105 1 0 1 0 20
4AOB_A 0.52 0.40 0.68 17 4346 9 1 7 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.71 0.56 0.90 18 3466 2 1 1 0 14

^top



Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 250
Total TN 89573
Total FP 177
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 138
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 328
Total Scores
MCC 0.514
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.503 ± 0.141
Sensitivity 0.433
Positive Predictive Value 0.617
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.61 0.53 0.70 16 2827 8 1 6 1 14
3J2L_3 0.65 0.53 0.80 28 7840 9 0 7 2 25
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_7 0.58 0.48 0.70 26 7103 11 0 11 0 28
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7481 22 6 16 0 33
3J3F_8 0.41 0.36 0.46 13 12218 27 1 14 12 23
3J3F_7 0.43 0.30 0.63 15 7236 9 0 9 0 35
3ZEX_D 0.75 0.65 0.86 32 6984 5 1 4 0 17
3ZND_W 0.41 0.39 0.43 9 2982 14 2 10 2 14
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11747 33 3 26 4 28
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 6 0 6 0 22
4AOB_A 0.49 0.38 0.64 16 4346 10 1 8 1 26
4ENB_A 0.34 0.26 0.45 5 1264 6 1 5 0 14
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.12 0.09 0.17 3 3468 15 0 15 0 29

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.