Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of ContextFold
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of PETfold_2.0(seed)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & PETfold_2.0(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
ContextFold |
|
PETfold_2.0(seed) |
|---|
| MCC |
0.780 |
>
|
0.769 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.786
±
0.332
|
>
|
0.771
±
0.133
|
| Sensitivity |
0.632 |
<
|
0.642 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.968 |
>
|
0.924 |
| Total TP |
60 |
<
|
61 |
| Total TN |
11145 |
>
|
11141 |
| Total FP |
2 |
<
|
7 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
1 |
=
|
1 |
| Total FP INCONS |
1 |
<
|
4 |
| Total FP COMP |
0 |
<
|
2 |
| Total FN |
35 |
>
|
34 |
| P-value |
0.0 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of ContextFold and PETfold_2.0(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for ContextFold
and PETfold_2.0(seed)).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and PETfold_2.0(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for ContextFold
and PETfold_2.0(seed)).
Performance of ContextFold
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
60 |
| Total TN |
11145 |
| Total FP |
2 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
1 |
| Total FP INCONS |
1 |
| Total FP COMP |
0 |
| Total FN |
35 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.780 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.786
±
0.332
|
| Sensitivity |
0.632 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.968 |
| Nr of predictions |
2 |
Performance of PETfold_2.0(seed)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_2.0(seed)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
61 |
| Total TN |
11141 |
| Total FP |
7 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
1 |
| Total FP INCONS |
4 |
| Total FP COMP |
2 |
| Total FN |
34 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.769 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.771
±
0.133
|
| Sensitivity |
0.642 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.924 |
| Nr of predictions |
2 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
| 
