CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.620 > 0.156
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.609 ± 0.103 > 0.071 ± 0.074
Sensitivity 0.506 > 0.036
Positive Predictive Value 0.765 > 0.689
Total TP 436 > 31
Total TN 128429 < 128954
Total FP 179 > 75
Total FP CONTRA 22 > 0
Total FP INCONS 112 > 14
Total FP COMP 45 < 61
Total FN 426 < 831
P-value 5.06544643719e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 436
Total TN 128429
Total FP 179
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 112
Total FP COMP 45
Total FN 426
Total Scores
MCC 0.620
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.609 ± 0.103
Sensitivity 0.506
Positive Predictive Value 0.765
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.55 0.50 0.63 10 1524 6 0 6 0 10
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2L_3 0.79 0.62 1.00 33 7842 2 0 0 2 20
3J3D_C 0.73 0.61 0.89 17 2756 2 0 2 0 11
3J3E_7 0.72 0.56 0.94 30 7108 2 0 2 0 24
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7483 29 9 11 9 33
3J3F_8 0.33 0.31 0.37 11 12216 29 3 16 10 25
3J3F_7 0.81 0.68 0.97 34 7225 1 0 1 0 16
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
3W1K_J 0.81 0.71 0.93 27 4157 2 1 1 0 11
3W3S_B 0.79 0.70 0.90 28 4722 4 0 3 1 12
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.67 0.97 33 6987 1 0 1 0 16
3ZEX_C 0.33 0.25 0.45 13 14167 22 1 15 6 39
3ZND_W 0.21 0.22 0.22 5 2980 20 0 18 2 18
4A1C_3 0.78 0.63 0.97 34 7105 1 0 1 0 20
4A1C_2 0.20 0.15 0.28 5 11763 26 0 13 13 28
4AOB_A 0.52 0.40 0.68 17 4346 9 1 7 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.71 0.56 0.90 18 3466 2 1 1 0 14
4FRN_A 0.40 0.33 0.50 12 5127 12 3 9 0 24
4JF2_A 0.50 0.39 0.67 12 2832 6 2 4 0 19

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 31
Total TN 128954
Total FP 75
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 14
Total FP COMP 61
Total FN 831
Total Scores
MCC 0.156
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.071 ± 0.074
Sensitivity 0.036
Positive Predictive Value 0.689
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.30 0.75 6 1532 2 0 2 0 14
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 30
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2850 0 0 0 0 30
3J20_1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2926 0 0 0 0 23
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7875 0 0 0 0 53
3J3D_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 28
3J3E_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 6 0 0 6 33
3J3F_8 0.23 0.11 0.50 4 12238 22 0 4 18 32
3J3F_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7260 0 0 0 0 50
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3570 0 0 0 0 37
3W1K_J 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4186 0 0 0 0 38
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4753 0 0 0 0 40
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7021 0 0 0 0 49
3ZEX_C 0.20 0.08 0.50 4 14188 22 0 4 18 48
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 23
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4A1C_2 0.08 0.03 0.20 1 11776 23 0 4 19 32
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5151 0 0 0 0 36
4JF2_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 16 2834 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.