CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.394 > 0.333
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.388 ± 0.238 > 0.326 ± 0.197
Sensitivity 0.322 > 0.224
Positive Predictive Value 0.488 < 0.500
Total TP 79 > 55
Total TN 54707 < 54759
Total FP 122 > 81
Total FP CONTRA 15 > 4
Total FP INCONS 68 > 51
Total FP COMP 39 > 26
Total FN 166 < 190
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 79
Total TN 54707
Total FP 122
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 68
Total FP COMP 39
Total FN 166
Total Scores
MCC 0.394
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.388 ± 0.238
Sensitivity 0.322
Positive Predictive Value 0.488
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.55 0.50 0.63 10 1524 6 0 6 0 10
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7483 29 9 11 9 33
3J3F_8 0.33 0.31 0.37 11 12216 29 3 16 10 25
3W3S_B 0.79 0.70 0.90 28 4722 4 0 3 1 12
3ZEX_C 0.33 0.25 0.45 13 14167 22 1 15 6 39
4A1C_2 0.20 0.15 0.28 5 11763 26 0 13 13 28
4JF2_A 0.50 0.39 0.67 12 2832 6 2 4 0 19

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 55
Total TN 54759
Total FP 81
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 51
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 190
Total Scores
MCC 0.333
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.326 ± 0.197
Sensitivity 0.224
Positive Predictive Value 0.500
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 10 0 10 0 20
3J3E_8 0.12 0.09 0.17 3 7485 22 2 13 7 30
3J3F_8 0.44 0.33 0.57 12 12225 15 1 8 6 24
3W3S_B 0.55 0.30 1.00 12 4741 1 0 0 1 28
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.19 0.53 10 14177 13 1 8 4 42
4A1C_2 0.31 0.24 0.40 8 11761 20 0 12 8 25
4JF2_A 0.57 0.32 1.00 10 2840 0 0 0 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.