CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Contrafold & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Contrafold Afold
MCC 0.481 > 0.408
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.506 ± 0.078 > 0.476 ± 0.076
Sensitivity 0.422 > 0.368
Positive Predictive Value 0.548 > 0.453
Total TP 2373 > 2068
Total TN 14428045 > 14427815
Total FP 2133 < 2672
Total FP CONTRA 326 < 352
Total FP INCONS 1632 < 2141
Total FP COMP 175 < 179
Total FN 3246 < 3551
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Contrafold and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Contrafold and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and Afold).

^top





Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2373
Total TN 14428045
Total FP 2133
Total FP CONTRA 326
Total FP INCONS 1632
Total FP COMP 175
Total FN 3246
Total Scores
MCC 0.481
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.506 ± 0.078
Sensitivity 0.422
Positive Predictive Value 0.548
Nr of predictions 54

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KFC_A - 0.45 0.25 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 15
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LC8_A 0.45 0.35 0.58 7 1528 5 2 3 0 13
2LKR_A - 0.84 0.79 0.89 31 6070 6 0 4 2 8
2M58_A - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1640 13 0 13 0 17
2RP0_A - 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 7
2WDL_A - 0.57 0.48 0.67 582 3937349 294 33 257 4 622
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WW9_D - 0.39 0.23 0.67 6 1944 3 2 1 0 20
2WW9_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 561 0 0 0 0 14
2ZZM_B 0.53 0.47 0.60 15 3461 10 2 8 0 17
2ZZN_D 0.82 0.78 0.88 21 2461 3 0 3 0 6
3A2K_C 0.44 0.43 0.46 12 2900 14 2 12 0 16
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3ADB_C - 0.92 0.84 1.00 32 4154 0 0 0 0 6
3AKZ_H 0.39 0.39 0.41 11 2674 17 4 12 1 17
3AM1_B - 0.68 0.63 0.73 22 3210 8 1 7 0 13
3G4S_9 0.30 0.25 0.38 14 7344 23 1 22 0 43
3GCA_A - 0.49 0.29 0.83 5 522 1 0 1 0 12
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.80 0.67 0.96 22 4255 1 0 1 0 11
3IYQ_A 0.34 0.37 0.32 35 60615 80 21 55 4 59
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.45 0.61 60 70777 44 4 35 5 72
3IZF_C 0.68 0.61 0.77 33 6860 10 1 9 0 21
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1218 7 0 7 0 17
3J2C_O - 0.79 0.67 0.93 42 10251 4 0 3 1 21
3J3E_8 0.07 0.06 0.10 2 7483 32 1 17 14 31
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2830 20 0 20 0 32
3JYX_3 0.28 0.30 0.27 8 6298 23 8 14 1 19
3JYX_5 - 0.36 0.35 0.37 311 5022016 626 153 385 88 582
3JYX_4 0.20 0.21 0.20 7 12211 35 6 22 7 26
3KIY_A - 0.56 0.47 0.67 585 4053253 305 29 261 15 656
3KTW_C - 0.44 0.40 0.50 17 4526 18 2 15 1 26
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.81 0.72 0.92 44 9132 5 0 4 1 17
3NKB_B - 0.54 0.50 0.59 13 1994 9 0 9 0 13
3NPB_A 0.76 0.70 0.84 32 6983 8 1 5 2 14
3O58_2 0.78 0.76 0.81 29 7224 10 2 5 3 9
3O58_3 0.28 0.26 0.31 9 12374 20 3 17 0 26
3RKF_A 0.73 0.59 0.91 20 2189 2 1 1 0 14
3U4M_B - 0.59 0.46 0.77 17 3138 5 0 5 0 20
3W3S_B 0.89 0.80 1.00 32 4721 1 0 0 1 8
3ZEX_B - 0.22 0.18 0.26 100 1071996 294 23 261 10 458
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2619 9 2 7 0 12
3ZEX_D 0.73 0.67 0.80 33 6980 8 1 7 0 16
3ZEX_H - 0.17 0.18 0.17 7 9003 35 6 29 0 31
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21889 58 4 52 2 77
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11751 33 5 20 8 28
4ATO_G - 0.44 0.40 0.50 4 520 4 0 4 0 6
4ENB_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1263 1 1 0 0 8
4FNJ_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 10 585 0 0 0 0 6
4JRC_A - 0.34 0.30 0.39 7 1522 11 0 11 0 16

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2068
Total TN 14427815
Total FP 2672
Total FP CONTRA 352
Total FP INCONS 2141
Total FP COMP 179
Total FN 3551
Total Scores
MCC 0.408
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.476 ± 0.076
Sensitivity 0.368
Positive Predictive Value 0.453
Nr of predictions 54

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KFC_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 622 8 0 8 0 20
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 6 0 5 1 9
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.87 1.00 34 6071 3 0 0 3 5
2M58_A - 0.33 0.29 0.38 5 1640 8 1 7 0 12
2RP0_A - 0.58 0.42 0.83 5 345 1 0 1 0 7
2WDL_A - 0.43 0.37 0.50 447 3937333 444 31 410 3 757
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WW9_D - 0.18 0.15 0.24 4 1936 13 0 13 0 22
2WW9_E - 0.47 0.29 0.80 4 556 1 0 1 0 10
2ZZM_B 0.21 0.19 0.25 6 3462 18 0 18 0 26
2ZZN_D 0.80 0.74 0.87 20 2462 3 0 3 0 7
3A2K_C 0.41 0.39 0.44 11 2901 14 2 12 0 17
3A3A_A 0.84 0.70 1.00 26 3629 0 0 0 0 11
3ADB_C - 0.78 0.74 0.82 28 4152 6 0 6 0 10
3AKZ_H 0.16 0.14 0.19 4 2680 17 2 15 0 24
3AM1_B - 0.72 0.66 0.79 23 3211 6 0 6 0 12
3G4S_9 0.48 0.35 0.67 20 7351 11 1 9 1 37
3GCA_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 519 9 0 9 0 17
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.62 0.58 0.68 19 4250 9 0 9 0 14
3IYQ_A 0.31 0.34 0.29 32 60616 82 23 55 4 62
3IZ4_A 0.48 0.45 0.51 59 70760 58 11 46 1 73
3IZF_C 0.66 0.57 0.76 31 6862 10 1 9 0 23
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1210 15 1 14 0 17
3J2C_O - 0.58 0.49 0.69 31 10251 15 1 13 1 32
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 7477 31 2 19 10 28
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2827 23 1 22 0 32
3JYX_3 0.54 0.56 0.54 15 6300 24 1 12 11 12
3JYX_5 - 0.29 0.30 0.29 268 5021928 735 179 490 66 625
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.31 10 12214 35 5 17 13 23
3KIY_A - 0.43 0.36 0.50 449 4053235 456 24 420 12 792
3KTW_C - 0.71 0.63 0.82 27 4527 7 2 4 1 16
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.84 0.74 0.96 45 9133 3 0 2 1 16
3NKB_B - 0.59 0.54 0.67 14 1995 7 0 7 0 12
3NPB_A 0.74 0.61 0.90 28 6990 5 0 3 2 18
3O58_2 0.66 0.66 0.66 25 7222 14 4 9 1 13
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 37 2 21 14 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3W3S_B 0.50 0.45 0.56 18 4721 15 1 13 1 22
3ZEX_B - 0.29 0.26 0.32 147 1071922 322 35 276 11 411
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2617 12 2 9 1 12
3ZEX_D 0.72 0.61 0.86 30 6986 5 0 5 0 19
3ZEX_H - 0.18 0.18 0.18 7 9006 33 6 26 1 31
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21892 55 2 51 2 77
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 43 5 26 12 28
4ATO_G - 0.32 0.30 0.38 3 520 6 1 4 1 7
4ENB_A 0.67 0.58 0.79 11 1261 3 1 2 0 8
4FNJ_A - 0.75 0.63 0.91 10 584 1 0 1 0 6
4JRC_A - 0.24 0.22 0.29 5 1523 12 0 12 0 18

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.