CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Contrafold & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Contrafold RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.491 > 0.482
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.523 ± 0.177 > 0.494 ± 0.152
Sensitivity 0.429 > 0.342
Positive Predictive Value 0.566 < 0.684
Total TP 201 > 160
Total TN 91697 < 91818
Total FP 200 > 107
Total FP CONTRA 27 > 8
Total FP INCONS 127 > 66
Total FP COMP 46 > 33
Total FN 267 < 308
P-value 0.00243391354489

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Contrafold and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Contrafold and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 201
Total TN 91697
Total FP 200
Total FP CONTRA 27
Total FP INCONS 127
Total FP COMP 46
Total FN 267
Total Scores
MCC 0.491
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.523 ± 0.177
Sensitivity 0.429
Positive Predictive Value 0.566
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.45 0.35 0.58 7 1528 5 2 3 0 13
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3J3E_8 0.07 0.06 0.10 2 7483 32 1 17 14 31
3J3F_8 0.31 0.33 0.29 12 12205 41 4 25 12 24
3JYX_4 0.20 0.21 0.20 7 12211 35 6 22 7 26
3O58_3 0.28 0.26 0.31 9 12374 20 3 17 0 26
3RKF_A 0.73 0.59 0.91 20 2189 2 1 1 0 14
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 2 7 0 22
3W3S_B 0.89 0.80 1.00 32 4721 1 0 0 1 8
3ZEX_C 0.28 0.21 0.38 11 14167 22 3 15 4 41
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11751 33 5 20 8 28
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 160
Total TN 91818
Total FP 107
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 66
Total FP COMP 33
Total FN 308
Total Scores
MCC 0.482
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.494 ± 0.152
Sensitivity 0.342
Positive Predictive Value 0.684
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 10 0 10 0 20
3A3A_A 0.70 0.49 1.00 18 3637 0 0 0 0 19
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3J3E_8 0.12 0.09 0.17 3 7485 22 2 13 7 30
3J3F_8 0.44 0.33 0.57 12 12225 15 1 8 6 24
3JYX_4 0.39 0.30 0.50 10 12226 13 2 8 3 23
3O58_3 0.45 0.34 0.60 12 12383 12 2 6 4 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26
3W3S_B 0.55 0.30 1.00 12 4741 1 0 0 1 28
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.19 0.53 10 14177 13 1 8 4 42
4A1C_2 0.31 0.24 0.40 8 11761 20 0 12 8 25
4JF2_A 0.57 0.32 1.00 10 2840 0 0 0 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.