CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Contrafold & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Contrafold RNAwolf
MCC 0.459 > 0.317
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.482 ± 0.081 > 0.342 ± 0.075
Sensitivity 0.394 > 0.293
Positive Predictive Value 0.537 > 0.344
Total TP 1142 > 849
Total TN 2521658 > 2521319
Total FP 1070 < 1693
Total FP CONTRA 89 < 186
Total FP INCONS 897 < 1432
Total FP COMP 84 > 75
Total FN 1754 < 2047
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Contrafold and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Contrafold and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1142
Total TN 2521658
Total FP 1070
Total FP CONTRA 89
Total FP INCONS 897
Total FP COMP 84
Total FN 1754
Total Scores
MCC 0.459
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.482 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.394
Positive Predictive Value 0.537
Nr of predictions 46

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.45 0.35 0.58 7 1528 5 2 3 0 13
2LKR_A - 0.84 0.79 0.89 31 6070 6 0 4 2 8
2M58_A - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1640 13 0 13 0 17
3AMU_B 0.65 0.59 0.73 16 2981 8 0 6 2 11
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 464 1 1 0 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.50 0.44 0.58 7 1116 5 2 3 0 9
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.28 8 6187 26 0 21 5 25
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1218 7 0 7 0 17
3J16_L 0.46 0.40 0.55 12 2753 10 1 9 0 18
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 4 0 0 4 2
3J20_2 0.58 0.51 0.66 321 1116277 172 10 157 5 312
3J20_0 0.44 0.40 0.50 12 2826 13 0 12 1 18
3J2C_O - 0.79 0.67 0.93 42 10251 4 0 3 1 21
3J2C_M - 0.43 0.34 0.53 71 106357 66 9 54 3 136
3J2L_3 0.56 0.49 0.65 26 7835 16 0 14 2 27
3J3D_C 0.67 0.61 0.74 17 2752 6 0 6 0 11
3J3E_7 0.45 0.37 0.56 20 7104 16 1 15 0 34
3J3E_8 0.07 0.06 0.10 2 7483 32 1 17 14 31
3J3F_8 0.31 0.33 0.29 12 12205 41 4 25 12 24
3J3F_7 0.68 0.62 0.76 31 7219 11 0 10 1 19
3J3V_B 0.48 0.39 0.61 22 6985 14 1 13 0 35
3RKF_A 0.73 0.59 0.91 20 2189 2 1 1 0 14
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 2 7 0 22
3U4M_B - 0.59 0.46 0.77 17 3138 5 0 5 0 20
3UZL_B 0.70 0.54 0.91 20 3548 2 0 2 0 17
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.89 0.80 1.00 32 4721 1 0 0 1 8
3ZEX_B - 0.22 0.18 0.26 100 1071996 294 23 261 10 458
3ZEX_D 0.73 0.67 0.80 33 6980 8 1 7 0 16
3ZEX_G - 0.28 0.24 0.33 18 16416 41 2 35 4 56
3ZEX_H - 0.17 0.18 0.17 7 9003 35 6 29 0 31
3ZEX_C 0.28 0.21 0.38 11 14167 22 3 15 4 41
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2619 9 2 7 0 12
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21889 58 4 52 2 77
3ZND_W 0.19 0.22 0.18 5 2975 25 1 22 2 18
4A1C_3 0.66 0.57 0.78 31 7100 9 1 8 0 23
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11751 33 5 20 8 28
4AOB_A 0.44 0.36 0.56 15 4344 13 1 11 1 27
4ATO_G - 0.44 0.40 0.50 4 520 4 0 4 0 6
4ENB_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1263 1 1 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8
4FNJ_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 10 585 0 0 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.68 0.56 0.82 18 3464 4 1 3 0 14
4FRN_A 0.65 0.56 0.77 20 5125 6 1 5 0 16
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12
4JRC_A - 0.34 0.30 0.39 7 1522 11 0 11 0 16

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 849
Total TN 2521319
Total FP 1693
Total FP CONTRA 186
Total FP INCONS 1432
Total FP COMP 75
Total FN 2047
Total Scores
MCC 0.317
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.342 ± 0.075
Sensitivity 0.293
Positive Predictive Value 0.344
Nr of predictions 46

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 10 1522 8 0 8 0 10
2LKR_A - 0.81 0.74 0.88 29 6072 8 0 4 4 10
2M58_A - 0.51 0.47 0.57 8 1639 6 3 3 0 9
3AMU_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 17 2980 9 0 6 3 10
3J0L_g - 0.16 0.25 0.11 1 456 8 6 2 0 3
3J0L_a - 0.18 0.19 0.20 3 1113 12 1 11 0 13
3J0L_2 - 0.11 0.12 0.11 4 6181 34 5 26 3 29
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1214 11 0 11 0 17
3J16_L 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2752 11 0 11 0 18
3J20_1 0.46 0.52 0.41 12 2897 17 6 11 0 11
3J20_2 0.45 0.42 0.49 266 1116224 283 17 258 8 367
3J20_0 0.40 0.40 0.41 12 2821 18 0 17 1 18
3J2C_O - 0.40 0.37 0.44 23 10244 30 0 29 1 40
3J2C_M - 0.19 0.17 0.21 35 106323 133 11 122 0 172
3J2L_3 0.55 0.49 0.62 26 7833 18 0 16 2 27
3J3D_C 0.79 0.75 0.84 21 2750 5 2 2 1 7
3J3E_7 0.41 0.35 0.49 19 7101 20 1 19 0 35
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7470 42 4 29 9 33
3J3F_8 0.23 0.25 0.21 9 12204 45 5 28 12 27
3J3F_7 0.21 0.20 0.23 10 7216 34 2 32 0 40
3J3V_B 0.43 0.37 0.51 21 6980 20 2 18 0 36
3RKF_A 0.72 0.62 0.84 21 2186 4 0 4 0 13
3SD1_A 0.46 0.43 0.50 18 3880 18 0 18 0 24
3U4M_B - 0.44 0.38 0.52 14 3133 13 0 13 0 23
3UZL_B 0.72 0.59 0.88 22 3545 4 1 2 1 15
3W1K_J 0.71 0.66 0.78 25 4154 7 0 7 0 13
3W3S_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 25 4719 10 0 9 1 15
3ZEX_B - 0.14 0.13 0.15 70 1071902 417 55 353 9 488
3ZEX_D 0.20 0.18 0.22 9 6980 32 3 29 0 40
3ZEX_G - 0.20 0.18 0.23 13 16415 43 6 37 0 61
3ZEX_H - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 9006 40 8 31 1 38
3ZEX_C 0.05 0.06 0.06 3 14144 49 12 37 0 49
3ZEX_F - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2613 20 6 9 5 12
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21876 69 10 59 0 77
3ZND_W 0.50 0.48 0.52 11 2982 13 0 10 3 12
4A1C_3 0.23 0.20 0.28 11 7101 28 2 26 0 43
4A1C_2 0.08 0.09 0.08 3 11741 46 10 27 9 30
4AOB_A 0.23 0.19 0.30 8 4344 20 1 18 1 34
4ATO_G - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 520 8 1 7 0 10
4ENB_A 0.35 0.32 0.40 6 1260 9 1 8 0 13
4ENC_A 0.34 0.32 0.38 6 1310 10 1 9 0 13
4FNJ_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 8 0 8 0 16
4FRG_B 0.56 0.50 0.64 16 3461 10 1 8 1 16
4FRN_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 5119 32 0 32 0 36
4JF2_A 0.67 0.58 0.78 18 2827 5 3 2 0 13
4JRC_A - 0.58 0.52 0.67 12 1522 6 0 6 0 11

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.