CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & Alterna [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold Alterna
MCC 0.629 > 0.528
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.574 ± 0.134 > 0.491 ± 0.115
Sensitivity 0.531 > 0.464
Positive Predictive Value 0.753 > 0.612
Total TP 222 > 194
Total TN 36022 > 36000
Total FP 76 < 125
Total FP CONTRA 7 < 15
Total FP INCONS 66 < 108
Total FP COMP 3 > 2
Total FN 196 < 224
P-value 2.71568867205e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and Alterna. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Alterna).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Alterna).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and Alterna. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Alterna).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 222
Total TN 36022
Total FP 76
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 66
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 196
Total Scores
MCC 0.629
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.574 ± 0.134
Sensitivity 0.531
Positive Predictive Value 0.753
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
2XQD_Y 0.81 0.78 0.84 21 2825 4 4 0 0 6
3ADB_C - 0.78 0.71 0.87 27 4155 4 0 4 0 11
3AKZ_H 0.66 0.57 0.76 16 2680 6 0 5 1 12
3AM1_B - 0.76 0.63 0.92 22 3216 2 0 2 0 13
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3J0L_7 - 0.30 0.29 0.33 5 1210 10 0 10 0 12
3J0L_a - 0.22 0.19 0.27 3 1117 8 1 7 0 13
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3NKB_B - 0.40 0.31 0.53 8 2001 7 0 7 0 18
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.62 0.50 0.78 21 3889 6 0 6 0 21
3UZL_B 0.45 0.38 0.54 14 3544 12 1 11 0 23

^top



Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 194
Total TN 36000
Total FP 125
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 108
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 224
Total Scores
MCC 0.528
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.491 ± 0.115
Sensitivity 0.464
Positive Predictive Value 0.612
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 845 1 0 1 0 3
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LC8_A 0.46 0.40 0.53 8 1525 7 0 7 0 12
2XQD_Y 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2829 5 0 5 0 11
3ADB_C - 0.59 0.55 0.64 21 4153 12 0 12 0 17
3AKZ_H 0.40 0.39 0.42 11 2675 15 4 11 0 17
3AM1_B - 0.61 0.57 0.67 20 3210 10 1 9 0 15
3AMU_B 0.64 0.59 0.70 16 2980 9 0 7 2 11
3J0L_7 - 0.26 0.24 0.31 4 1212 9 0 9 0 13
3J0L_a - 0.23 0.19 0.30 3 1118 7 1 6 0 13
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 456 9 4 5 0 4
3J16_L 0.63 0.53 0.76 16 2754 5 1 4 0 14
3NKB_B - 0.35 0.31 0.42 8 1997 11 0 11 0 18
3RKF_A 0.69 0.56 0.86 19 2189 3 1 2 0 15
3SD1_A 0.46 0.38 0.57 16 3888 12 1 11 0 26
3UZL_B 0.52 0.43 0.64 16 3545 9 2 7 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.