CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & CRWrnafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold CRWrnafold
MCC 0.526 > 0.473
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.503 ± 0.158 > 0.425 ± 0.176
Sensitivity 0.449 > 0.406
Positive Predictive Value 0.625 > 0.560
Total TP 155 > 140
Total TN 36257 > 36255
Total FP 98 < 117
Total FP CONTRA 8 < 14
Total FP INCONS 85 < 96
Total FP COMP 5 < 7
Total FN 190 < 205
P-value 2.10198558684e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and CRWrnafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and CRWrnafold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and CRWrnafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and CRWrnafold).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 155
Total TN 36257
Total FP 98
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 85
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 190
Total Scores
MCC 0.526
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.503 ± 0.158
Sensitivity 0.449
Positive Predictive Value 0.625
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
2LKR_A - 0.50 0.44 0.59 17 6076 12 2 10 0 22
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3J0L_2 - 0.39 0.36 0.43 12 6188 18 2 14 2 21
3J0L_a - 0.22 0.19 0.27 3 1117 8 1 7 0 13
3J0L_7 - 0.30 0.29 0.33 5 1210 10 0 10 0 12
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3SD1_A 0.62 0.50 0.78 21 3889 6 0 6 0 21
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4

^top



Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 140
Total TN 36255
Total FP 117
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 96
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 205
Total Scores
MCC 0.473
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.425 ± 0.176
Sensitivity 0.406
Positive Predictive Value 0.560
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LKR_A - 0.52 0.44 0.63 17 6078 12 2 8 2 22
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.28 8 6187 23 2 19 2 25
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.31 0.50 5 1118 5 1 4 0 11
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J16_L 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2754 0 0 0 0 9
3SD1_A 0.52 0.45 0.61 19 3885 12 2 10 0 23
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
4AOB_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 4344 8 2 5 1 22
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1313 2 1 1 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.