CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & Carnac(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold Carnac(20)
MCC 0.642 > 0.619
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.658 ± 0.086 > 0.564 ± 0.129
Sensitivity 0.543 > 0.436
Positive Predictive Value 0.765 < 0.882
Total TP 336 > 270
Total TN 85120 < 85253
Total FP 123 > 47
Total FP CONTRA 16 > 1
Total FP INCONS 87 > 35
Total FP COMP 20 > 11
Total FN 283 < 349
P-value 2.76499031155e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and Carnac(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Carnac(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Carnac(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and Carnac(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Carnac(20)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 336
Total TN 85120
Total FP 123
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 87
Total FP COMP 20
Total FN 283
Total Scores
MCC 0.642
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.658 ± 0.086
Sensitivity 0.543
Positive Predictive Value 0.765
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2XQD_Y 0.81 0.78 0.84 21 2825 4 4 0 0 6
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3IZF_C 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 6867 6 0 6 0 24
3J20_1 0.69 0.70 0.70 16 2903 7 2 5 0 7
3J20_0 0.66 0.57 0.77 17 2828 6 1 4 1 13
3J2L_3 0.56 0.43 0.72 23 7843 11 0 9 2 30
3O58_2 0.80 0.68 0.93 26 7232 3 0 2 1 12
3O58_3 0.36 0.34 0.38 12 12371 29 5 15 9 23
3PDR_A 0.72 0.54 0.95 39 12839 4 0 2 2 33
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.62 0.50 0.78 21 3889 6 0 6 0 21
3ZEX_D 0.58 0.49 0.69 24 6986 11 0 11 0 25
3ZND_W 0.40 0.39 0.41 9 2981 15 2 11 2 14
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 3465 0 0 0 0 11

^top



Performance of Carnac(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 270
Total TN 85253
Total FP 47
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 35
Total FP COMP 11
Total FN 349
Total Scores
MCC 0.619
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.564 ± 0.129
Sensitivity 0.436
Positive Predictive Value 0.882
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2XQD_Y 0.79 0.63 1.00 17 2833 0 0 0 0 10
3AMU_B 0.69 0.59 0.80 16 2983 6 0 4 2 11
3IZF_C 0.73 0.56 0.97 30 6872 1 0 1 0 24
3J20_1 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2909 0 0 0 0 6
3J20_0 0.62 0.53 0.73 16 2828 7 0 6 1 14
3J2L_3 0.46 0.34 0.64 18 7847 11 0 10 1 35
3O58_2 0.83 0.71 0.96 27 7232 2 0 1 1 11
3O58_3 0.51 0.26 1.00 9 12394 0 0 0 0 26
3PDR_A 0.62 0.40 0.97 29 12850 3 0 1 2 43
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26
3ZEX_D 0.73 0.53 1.00 26 6995 0 0 0 0 23
3ZND_W 0.47 0.39 0.56 9 2987 10 0 7 3 14
4AOB_A 0.49 0.33 0.74 14 4352 6 1 4 1 28
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19
4FRG_B 0.43 0.19 1.00 6 3480 0 0 0 0 26

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.