CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & Multilign(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold Multilign(20)
MCC 0.628 > 0.592
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.653 ± 0.107 > 0.577 ± 0.139
Sensitivity 0.529 > 0.496
Positive Predictive Value 0.751 > 0.714
Total TP 208 > 195
Total TN 42986 < 42990
Total FP 77 < 86
Total FP CONTRA 7 < 8
Total FP INCONS 62 < 70
Total FP COMP 8 = 8
Total FN 185 < 198
P-value 5.4618626652e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Multilign(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Multilign(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Multilign(20)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 208
Total TN 42986
Total FP 77
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 62
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 185
Total Scores
MCC 0.628
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.653 ± 0.107
Sensitivity 0.529
Positive Predictive Value 0.751
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3J20_1 0.69 0.70 0.70 16 2903 7 2 5 0 7
3J20_0 0.66 0.57 0.77 17 2828 6 1 4 1 13
3J2L_3 0.56 0.43 0.72 23 7843 11 0 9 2 30
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.62 0.50 0.78 21 3889 6 0 6 0 21
3ZEX_D 0.58 0.49 0.69 24 6986 11 0 11 0 25
3ZND_W 0.40 0.39 0.41 9 2981 15 2 11 2 14
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 3465 0 0 0 0 11

^top



Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 195
Total TN 42990
Total FP 86
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 70
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 198
Total Scores
MCC 0.592
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.577 ± 0.139
Sensitivity 0.496
Positive Predictive Value 0.714
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.63 0.56 0.71 15 2982 8 0 6 2 12
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.61 0.53 0.70 16 2827 8 1 6 1 14
3J2L_3 0.65 0.53 0.80 28 7840 9 0 7 2 25
3RKF_A 0.77 0.62 0.95 21 2189 1 0 1 0 13
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 1 8 0 22
3ZEX_D 0.75 0.65 0.86 32 6984 5 1 4 0 17
3ZND_W 0.41 0.39 0.43 9 2982 14 2 10 2 14
4AOB_A 0.49 0.38 0.64 16 4346 10 1 8 1 26
4ENB_A 0.34 0.26 0.45 5 1264 6 1 5 0 14
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.12 0.09 0.17 3 3468 15 0 15 0 29

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.