CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold RDfolder
MCC 0.629 > 0.425
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.603 ± 0.112 > 0.394 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.532 > 0.331
Positive Predictive Value 0.752 > 0.558
Total TP 288 > 179
Total TN 47467 < 47529
Total FP 101 < 147
Total FP CONTRA 10 = 10
Total FP INCONS 85 < 132
Total FP COMP 6 > 5
Total FN 253 < 362
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RDfolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 288
Total TN 47467
Total FP 101
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 85
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 253
Total Scores
MCC 0.629
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.603 ± 0.112
Sensitivity 0.532
Positive Predictive Value 0.752
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
2XQD_Y 0.81 0.78 0.84 21 2825 4 4 0 0 6
3ADB_C - 0.78 0.71 0.87 27 4155 4 0 4 0 11
3AKZ_H 0.66 0.57 0.76 16 2680 6 0 5 1 12
3AM1_B - 0.76 0.63 0.92 22 3216 2 0 2 0 13
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3J0L_a - 0.22 0.19 0.27 3 1117 8 1 7 0 13
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_7 - 0.30 0.29 0.33 5 1210 10 0 10 0 12
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_0 0.66 0.57 0.77 17 2828 6 1 4 1 13
3NKB_B - 0.40 0.31 0.53 8 2001 7 0 7 0 18
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.62 0.50 0.78 21 3889 6 0 6 0 21
3W3S_B 0.44 0.38 0.52 15 4724 15 0 14 1 25
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ATO_G - 0.73 0.70 0.78 7 519 2 1 1 0 3
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 179
Total TN 47529
Total FP 147
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 132
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 362
Total Scores
MCC 0.425
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.394 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.331
Positive Predictive Value 0.558
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.88 0.78 1.00 14 847 0 0 0 0 4
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1526 14 2 12 0 20
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
3ADB_C - 0.46 0.39 0.54 15 4158 13 0 13 0 23
3AKZ_H 0.48 0.43 0.55 12 2679 11 1 9 1 16
3AM1_B - 0.47 0.43 0.54 15 3212 13 1 12 0 20
3AMU_B 0.18 0.15 0.22 4 2985 16 2 12 2 23
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1124 4 1 3 0 16
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 462 3 1 2 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1220 5 0 5 0 17
3J16_L 0.22 0.17 0.31 5 2759 11 0 11 0 25
3J20_0 0.73 0.57 0.94 17 2832 2 0 1 1 13
3NKB_B - 0.37 0.31 0.47 8 1999 9 0 9 0 18
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.30 0.17 0.54 7 3903 6 0 6 0 35
3W3S_B 0.27 0.23 0.33 9 4726 18 1 17 0 31
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ATO_G - 0.63 0.40 1.00 4 524 0 0 0 0 6
4ENB_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1265 4 0 4 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 0 4 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.