CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & RSpredict(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold RSpredict(seed)
MCC 0.618 > 0.137
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.635 ± 0.080 > 0.097 ± 0.079
Sensitivity 0.519 > 0.056
Positive Predictive Value 0.741 > 0.348
Total TP 430 > 46
Total TN 106330 < 106778
Total FP 172 > 88
Total FP CONTRA 19 > 1
Total FP INCONS 131 > 85
Total FP COMP 22 > 2
Total FN 398 < 782
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and RSpredict(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RSpredict(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RSpredict(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and RSpredict(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RSpredict(seed)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 430
Total TN 106330
Total FP 172
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 131
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 398
Total Scores
MCC 0.618
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.635 ± 0.080
Sensitivity 0.519
Positive Predictive Value 0.741
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
2XQD_Y 0.81 0.78 0.84 21 2825 4 4 0 0 6
3AKZ_H 0.66 0.57 0.76 16 2680 6 0 5 1 12
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3IZF_C 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 6867 6 0 6 0 24
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_1 0.69 0.70 0.70 16 2903 7 2 5 0 7
3J20_0 0.66 0.57 0.77 17 2828 6 1 4 1 13
3J2L_3 0.56 0.43 0.72 23 7843 11 0 9 2 30
3O58_2 0.80 0.68 0.93 26 7232 3 0 2 1 12
3O58_3 0.36 0.34 0.38 12 12371 29 5 15 9 23
3PDR_A 0.72 0.54 0.95 39 12839 4 0 2 2 33
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.62 0.50 0.78 21 3889 6 0 6 0 21
3UZL_B 0.45 0.38 0.54 14 3544 12 1 11 0 23
3W3S_B 0.44 0.38 0.52 15 4724 15 0 14 1 25
3ZEX_D 0.58 0.49 0.69 24 6986 11 0 11 0 25
3ZND_W 0.40 0.39 0.41 9 2981 15 2 11 2 14
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 3465 0 0 0 0 11
4FRN_A 0.20 0.14 0.31 5 5135 11 2 9 0 31

^top



Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 46
Total TN 106778
Total FP 88
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 85
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 782
Total Scores
MCC 0.137
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.097 ± 0.079
Sensitivity 0.056
Positive Predictive Value 0.348
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 860 1 0 1 0 18
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1527 13 0 13 0 20
2XQD_Y 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2845 5 0 5 0 27
3AKZ_H 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2699 2 0 2 0 28
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3001 2 0 2 0 27
3IZF_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6898 5 0 5 0 54
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2774 1 0 1 0 30
3J20_1 0.09 0.04 0.20 1 2921 4 0 4 0 22
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2846 4 0 4 0 30
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7870 5 0 5 0 53
3O58_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7257 3 0 3 0 38
3O58_3 0.23 0.09 0.60 3 12398 2 0 2 0 32
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12872 8 0 8 0 72
3RKF_A 0.71 0.53 0.95 18 2192 1 0 1 0 16
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3564 6 0 6 0 37
3W3S_B 0.41 0.30 0.57 12 4732 10 1 8 1 28
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7019 2 0 2 0 49
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3000 4 0 3 1 23
4AOB_A 0.35 0.14 0.86 6 4364 1 0 1 0 36
4ENB_A 0.30 0.16 0.60 3 1270 2 0 2 0 16
4ENC_A 0.30 0.16 0.60 3 1321 2 0 2 0 16
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3484 2 0 2 0 32
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5148 3 0 3 0 36

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.