CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Fold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Fold & Alterna [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Fold Alterna
MCC 0.624 > 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.547 ± 0.170 > 0.507 ± 0.113
Sensitivity 0.538 > 0.478
Positive Predictive Value 0.732 > 0.628
Total TP 240 > 213
Total TN 38915 > 38904
Total FP 91 < 130
Total FP CONTRA 8 < 15
Total FP INCONS 80 < 111
Total FP COMP 3 < 4
Total FN 206 < 233
P-value 3.02344513449e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Fold and Alterna. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and Alterna).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and Alterna).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Fold and Alterna. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and Alterna).

^top





Performance of Fold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 240
Total TN 38915
Total FP 91
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 80
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 206
Total Scores
MCC 0.624
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.547 ± 0.170
Sensitivity 0.538
Positive Predictive Value 0.732
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.39 0.26 0.63 5 622 3 1 2 0 14
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2WWQ_V 0.76 0.64 0.90 18 2906 3 0 2 1 10
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
3ADB_C - 0.80 0.74 0.88 28 4154 4 0 4 0 10
3AKZ_H 0.84 0.75 0.95 21 2679 1 1 0 0 7
3AM1_B - 0.78 0.71 0.86 25 3211 4 0 4 0 10
3AMU_B 0.64 0.59 0.70 16 2980 9 0 7 2 11
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1213 12 0 12 0 17
3J0L_a - 0.20 0.19 0.23 3 1115 10 2 8 0 13
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J16_L 0.63 0.53 0.76 16 2754 5 0 5 0 14
3NKB_B - 0.35 0.31 0.42 8 1997 11 0 11 0 18
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 1 8 0 22
3UZL_B 0.77 0.62 0.96 23 3546 1 0 1 0 14

^top



Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 213
Total TN 38904
Total FP 130
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 111
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 233
Total Scores
MCC 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.507 ± 0.113
Sensitivity 0.478
Positive Predictive Value 0.628
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 845 1 0 1 0 3
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LC8_A 0.46 0.40 0.53 8 1525 7 0 7 0 12
2WWQ_V 0.76 0.68 0.86 19 2904 5 0 3 2 9
2XQD_Y 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2829 5 0 5 0 11
3ADB_C - 0.59 0.55 0.64 21 4153 12 0 12 0 17
3AKZ_H 0.40 0.39 0.42 11 2675 15 4 11 0 17
3AM1_B - 0.61 0.57 0.67 20 3210 10 1 9 0 15
3AMU_B 0.64 0.59 0.70 16 2980 9 0 7 2 11
3J0L_7 - 0.26 0.24 0.31 4 1212 9 0 9 0 13
3J0L_a - 0.23 0.19 0.30 3 1118 7 1 6 0 13
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 456 9 4 5 0 4
3J16_L 0.63 0.53 0.76 16 2754 5 1 4 0 14
3NKB_B - 0.35 0.31 0.42 8 1997 11 0 11 0 18
3RKF_A 0.69 0.56 0.86 19 2189 3 1 2 0 15
3SD1_A 0.46 0.38 0.57 16 3888 12 1 11 0 26
3UZL_B 0.52 0.43 0.64 16 3545 9 2 7 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.